Skills arrive-guideline-architect
Generate ARRIVE 2.0 compliant animal research protocols with structured
git clone https://github.com/openclaw/skills
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/openclaw/skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/aipoch-ai/arrive-guideline-architect" ~/.claude/skills/openclaw-skills-arrive-guideline-architect && rm -rf "$T"
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/openclaw/skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.openclaw/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/aipoch-ai/arrive-guideline-architect" ~/.openclaw/skills/openclaw-skills-arrive-guideline-architect && rm -rf "$T"
skills/aipoch-ai/arrive-guideline-architect/SKILL.mdARRIVE Guideline Architect
Overview
AI-powered protocol design tool that creates publication-ready animal research protocols compliant with ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments). Generates structured documentation for ethical review, transparent reporting, and reproducible science.
Key Capabilities:
- Protocol Generation: Complete ARRIVE 2.0 compliant study protocols
- Sample Size Calculator: Statistical power analysis with justification
- Compliance Checker: Validate existing protocols against ARRIVE standards
- Randomization Schemes: Generate and document allocation strategies
- Ethics Support: IACUC protocol templates and animal welfare documentation
- Reporting Templates: Manuscript preparation with required elements
When to Use
✅ Use this skill when:
- Designing new animal studies requiring ethical approval
- Preparing IACUC (Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee) applications
- Writing manuscripts for journals requiring ARRIVE compliance (PLOS, Nature, etc.)
- Validating existing protocols for transparency and completeness
- Training researchers on animal research best practices
- Planning multi-site studies requiring standardized protocols
- Reviewing protocols for grant applications
❌ Do NOT use when:
- Human clinical trials → Use
clinical-protocol-designer - In vitro studies (cell culture only) → No ARRIVE requirements apply
- Field studies on wild animals → Use specialized wildlife research guidelines
- Veterinary clinical cases → Use veterinary case report standards
- Systematic reviews/meta-analyses → Use PRISMA guidelines
Integration:
- Upstream:
(statistical design)sample-size-power-calculator - Downstream:
(ethics submission),iacuc-protocol-drafter
(publication)manuscript-prep-assistant
Core Capabilities
1. ARRIVE 2.0 Protocol Builder
Generate complete protocols covering all Essential 10 items:
from scripts.arrive_builder import ARRIVEBuilder builder = ARRIVEBuilder() # Generate full protocol protocol = builder.generate_protocol( title="Efficacy of Compound X in Type 2 Diabetes Mouse Model", species="Mus musculus", strain="db/db", groups=[ {"name": "Control", "n": 15, "treatment": "Vehicle"}, {"name": "Low Dose", "n": 15, "treatment": "10 mg/kg"}, {"name": "High Dose", "n": 15, "treatment": "50 mg/kg"} ], primary_endpoint="Fasting blood glucose reduction", duration_days=28 ) protocol.save("protocol.md")
Generates:
- Study Design: Experimental groups, timelines, endpoints
- Sample Size: Power calculations with justification
- Inclusion/Exclusion: Animal selection criteria
- Randomization: Allocation method (software/hardware)
- Blinding: Who, when, how blinding implemented
- Outcome Measures: Primary, secondary, exploratory endpoints
- Statistical Methods: Analysis plan, software, significance level
- Experimental Animals: Species, strain, sex, age, weight, source
- Experimental Procedures: Detailed methods with timing
- Results Reporting: Data presentation templates
2. Sample Size Calculator
Statistical power analysis with ARRIVE-compliant justification:
from scripts.sample_size import SampleSizeCalculator calc = SampleSizeCalculator() # Calculate with effect size result = calc.calculate( test_type="two_sample_t_test", effect_size=0.8, # Cohen's d alpha=0.05, power=0.80, expected_dropout=0.10 # 10% attrition ) # Output: n=26 per group (total 78, accounting for 10% dropout)
Features:
- Effect Size Selection: Cohen's d, odds ratio, hazard ratio
- Multiple Comparisons: Bonferroni, FDR corrections
- Dropout Adjustment: Account for expected attrition
- Justification Text: Auto-generate sample size rationale
- Power Curves: Generate power calculations for various sample sizes
3. Compliance Validator
Check existing protocols against ARRIVE 2.0:
python scripts/validate.py --input my_protocol.md --format markdown
Output:
✅ Essential 10: 10/10 complete ⚠️ Recommended Set: 8/15 complete Missing: Data sharing statement, Conflict of interest Detailed Report: - Item 1 (Study Design): Complete - Item 2 (Sample Size): Complete - Item 3 (Inclusion Criteria): Missing - add exclusion criteria - ...
Validation Levels:
- Essential 10: Required for all publications
- Recommended Set: Required by top-tier journals
- Journal-Specific: Custom checks for specific publishers
4. Randomization & Blinding Generator
Create allocation schemes with documentation:
from scripts.randomization import RandomizationGenerator gen = RandomizationGenerator() # Generate allocation allocation = gen.generate( n_animals=45, n_groups=3, method="block_randomization", # or "simple", "stratified" block_size=6, seed=42 # For reproducibility ) # Output allocation table allocation.save("allocation_table.csv") allocation.generate_blinding_key("blinding_key.xlsx")
Methods Supported:
- Simple randomization
- Block randomization (fixed/random block sizes)
- Stratified randomization (by sex, age, baseline)
- Covariate-adaptive minimization
Common Patterns
Pattern 1: Drug Efficacy Study
Template for therapeutic intervention studies:
{ "study_type": "efficacy", "species": "Mus musculus", "model": "Disease model (e.g., db/db diabetic mice)", "intervention": "Test compound", "groups": [ "Sham control", "Disease control (vehicle)", "Positive control (reference drug)", "Test compound (low dose)", "Test compound (high dose)" ], "primary_endpoint": "Disease biomarker", "secondary_endpoints": ["Safety markers", "Histopathology"], "sampling_timepoints": ["Baseline", "Week 2", "Week 4"] }
Key Considerations:
- Include positive control for assay validation
- Multiple doses to establish dose-response
- Power calculation based on expected effect size
- Sample size accounts for disease variability
Pattern 2: Toxicology Study
Template for safety assessment:
{ "study_type": "toxicology", "species": "Rat", "duration": "28-day repeat dose", "dose_levels": ["Vehicle", "Low", "Mid", "High", "Limit"], "endpoints": [ "Clinical observations (daily)", "Body weight (twice weekly)", "Food consumption", "Clinical pathology (hematology, chemistry)", "Necropsy and organ weights", "Histopathology" ], "recovery_groups": true # 14-day recovery period }
Key Considerations:
- Dose selection based on MTD (maximum tolerated dose)
- Recovery groups for reversibility assessment
- Comprehensive clinical pathology panels
- Histopathology on all high-dose and control animals
Pattern 3: Behavioral Study
Template for neuroscience/behavioral research:
{ "study_type": "behavioral", "species": "C57BL/6 mice", "tests": [ "Open field (anxiety/locomotion)", "Elevated plus maze (anxiety)", "Novel object recognition (memory)", "Fear conditioning (learning)" ], "controls": [ "Positive pharmacological control", "Negative control (vehicle)" ], "blinding": "Video analysis performed blinded", "randomization": "Latin square design for test order" }
Key Considerations:
- Counterbalance test order (learning effects)
- Blind video analysis to prevent bias
- Standardized testing environment (lighting, noise)
- Experimenter training and reliability testing
Pattern 4: Surgical Model Study
Template for procedure-based research:
{ "study_type": "surgical", "procedure": "Myocardial infarction (LAD ligation)", "species": "Sprague-Dawley rats", "sham_control": true, "perioperative_care": { "analgesia": "Buprenorphine SR", "antibiotics": "Enrofloxacin", "monitoring": "Temperature, respiration, pain scoring" }, "outcome_measures": [ "Survival rate", "Echocardiography", "Histological infarct size" ], "humane_endpoints": ["Severe distress", "Inability to ambulate"] }
Key Considerations:
- Detailed surgical protocol with timing
- Comprehensive perioperative care
- Clear humane endpoints (refinement)
- Sham surgery controls for procedure effects
- Pain management per IACUC guidelines
Complete Workflow Example
From study concept to IACUC submission:
# Step 1: Create study brief cat > study_brief.json << EOF { "title": "Novel Compound X in Diabetic Nephropathy", "species": "Mouse", "strain": "db/db", "groups": 4, "primary_endpoint": "Albuminuria reduction", "duration_weeks": 12 } EOF # Step 2: Generate protocol python scripts/main.py \ --input study_brief.json \ --output protocol.md \ --include-checklist # Step 3: Calculate sample size python scripts/sample_size.py \ --test t_test \ --effect-size 0.8 \ --alpha 0.05 \ --power 0.80 \ --dropout 0.10 # Step 4: Generate randomization python scripts/randomize.py \ --n-total 64 \ --n-groups 4 \ --method block \ --output allocation.csv # Step 5: Validate ARRIVE compliance python scripts/validate.py \ --input protocol.md \ --format pdf \ --output compliance_report.pdf
Output Files:
output/ ├── protocol.md # Complete ARRIVE protocol ├── sample_size_justification.txt # Statistical rationale ├── allocation.csv # Randomization table ├── blinding_key.xlsx # Blinding documentation ├── compliance_report.pdf # ARRIVE checklist └├── iacuc_supplemental.pdf # Ethics committee materials
Quality Checklist
Pre-Study:
- CRITICAL: IACUC approval obtained before starting
- Sample size adequately powered (≥80%)
- Randomization method documented and reproducible
- Blinding plan clear for all assessors
- Humane endpoints defined with clear criteria
- Inclusion/exclusion criteria prespecified
During Study:
- Randomization followed without deviations
- Blinding maintained (unblinding only for safety)
- All animals accounted for (CONSORT-style flow diagram)
- Adverse events documented and reported to IACUC
- Sample collection at predetermined timepoints
Reporting:
- All Essential 10 items addressed in manuscript
- CONSORT-style flow diagram for animal studies
- Raw data available (or sharing statement)
- Conflict of interest disclosed
- Funding sources acknowledged
Common Pitfalls
Design Issues:
-
❌ Inadequate controls → Cannot distinguish treatment from confounding effects
- ✅ Always include appropriate controls (vehicle, positive, sham)
-
❌ Convenience sampling → Selection bias
- ✅ Random allocation to treatment groups
-
❌ Unblinded assessment → Observer bias
- ✅ Blinded outcome assessment whenever possible
Sample Size Issues:
-
❌ No power calculation → Underpowered study, false negatives
- ✅ Calculate sample size a priori with justification
-
❌ Ignoring dropout → Final sample too small
- ✅ Account for expected attrition (typically 10-20%)
Reporting Issues:
-
❌ Selective outcome reporting → Publication bias
- ✅ Pre-register primary and secondary endpoints
-
❌ Missing animal numbers → Transparency concerns
- ✅ Report n for every analysis
References
Available in
references/ directory:
- Official ARRIVE 2.0 checklist and explanationsarrive_2.0_guidelines.md
- Statistical methods for animal studiessample_size_guidelines.md
- Mouse, rat, zebrafish considerationsspecies_specific_requirements.md
- Requirements by publisher (Nature, Science, Cell)journal_compliance.md
- Analysis approaches for common designsstatistical_methods.md
- Ethics committee application templatesiacuc_templates.md
- Published compliant protocols as examplesexample_protocols.md
Scripts
Located in
scripts/ directory:
- Protocol generation CLImain.py
- Core protocol builderarrive_builder.py
- Power analysis calculatorsample_size.py
- Allocation scheme generatorrandomization.py
- ARRIVE compliance checkervalidate.py
- Interactive checklist toolchecklist_generator.py
- Multi-format output (PDF, Word, Markdown)export.py
Limitations
- Template-Based: Generates standard protocols; highly specialized studies may need customization
- No Statistical Analysis: Calculates sample size but does not perform analysis
- No Real-Time Monitoring: Protocol generation only; does not track actual experiments
- Species Coverage: Optimized for mice and rats; other species may need adaptation
- Regulatory Variation: IACUC requirements vary by institution; may need local customization
🐾 Remember: The 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) are ethical imperatives. This tool supports Reduction (optimal sample sizes) and Refinement (better experimental design), but consider Replacement alternatives (in vitro, in silico) whenever possible.
Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| flag | - | Interactive mode: Run wizard with guided prompts (uses for user interaction). Recommended for first-time users or complex study designs. |
| str | Required | Input JSON file path (batch/automation mode) |
| str | "protocol.md" | Output file path |
| str | Required | Validate existing protocol file |
| str | Required | Generate ARRIVE 2.0 checklist |
| str | "markdown" | Output format: markdown, pdf, or docx |
Usage Modes:
- Automation Mode (Recommended for CI/CD): Use
with JSON configuration file--input - Interactive Mode: Use
for guided setup via prompts--interactive
Example - Automation Mode:
# Create JSON config cat > study_config.json << 'EOF' { "title": "Diabetes Drug Study", "species": "Mus musculus", "strain": "db/db", "groups": 4, "animals_per_group": 15 } EOF # Generate protocol python scripts/main.py --input study_config.json --output protocol.md
Example - Interactive Mode:
# Launch interactive wizard python scripts/main.py --interactive