Skills conference-abstract-adaptor
Adapt abstracts to meet specific conference word limits and formats
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/openclaw/skills
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/openclaw/skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/aipoch-ai/conference-abstract-adaptor" ~/.claude/skills/openclaw-skills-conference-abstract-adaptor && rm -rf "$T"
OpenClaw · Install into ~/.openclaw/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/openclaw/skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.openclaw/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/aipoch-ai/conference-abstract-adaptor" ~/.openclaw/skills/openclaw-skills-conference-abstract-adaptor && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
skills/aipoch-ai/conference-abstract-adaptor/SKILL.mdsource content
Conference Abstract Adaptor
Conference-specific abstract formatting.
Use Cases
- Multi-conference submissions
- Word count compliance
- Format standardization
- Deadline management
Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Default | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
, | string | - | Yes | Abstract text file path |
, | string | - | Yes | Target conference (ASGCT, ASCO, SfN, AACR, ASM) |
, | string | - | No | Output file path |
, | flag | - | No | List supported conferences |
Usage
# Adapt abstract for ASCO python scripts/main.py --abstract my_abstract.txt --conference ASCO # Save adapted abstract to file python scripts/main.py --abstract my_abstract.txt --conference ASGCT --output adapted.txt # List all supported conferences python scripts/main.py --list-conferences
Supported Conferences
| Conference | Word Limit | Format |
|---|---|---|
| ASGCT | 250 words | Structured (Background/Methods/Results/Conclusion) |
| ASCO | 260 words | Structured (Background/Methods/Results/Conclusion) |
| SfN | 2000 chars | Single abstract |
| AACR | 300 words | Structured (Background/Methods/Results/Conclusion) |
| ASM | 300 words | Single abstract |
Returns
- Reformatted abstract
- Word count verification
- Required sections checklist
- Submission-ready text
Risk Assessment
| Risk Indicator | Assessment | Level |
|---|---|---|
| Code Execution | Python/R scripts executed locally | Medium |
| Network Access | No external API calls | Low |
| File System Access | Read input files, write output files | Medium |
| Instruction Tampering | Standard prompt guidelines | Low |
| Data Exposure | Output files saved to workspace | Low |
Security Checklist
- No hardcoded credentials or API keys
- No unauthorized file system access (../)
- Output does not expose sensitive information
- Prompt injection protections in place
- Input file paths validated (no ../ traversal)
- Output directory restricted to workspace
- Script execution in sandboxed environment
- Error messages sanitized (no stack traces exposed)
- Dependencies audited
Prerequisites
No additional Python packages required.
Evaluation Criteria
Success Metrics
- Successfully executes main functionality
- Output meets quality standards
- Handles edge cases gracefully
- Performance is acceptable
Test Cases
- Basic Functionality: Standard input → Expected output
- Edge Case: Invalid input → Graceful error handling
- Performance: Large dataset → Acceptable processing time
Lifecycle Status
- Current Stage: Draft
- Next Review Date: 2026-03-06
- Known Issues: None
- Planned Improvements:
- Performance optimization
- Additional feature support