harness — Agent Engineering Harness

Implements the OpenAI Codex team's agent-first engineering harness pattern for any repo: short AGENTS.md TOC, structured docs/, custom linters with agent-readable errors, CI enforcement, execution plan templates, doc-gardening.

Validated against: Agent Tool Design Guidelines (2026-03-09)

When to use

• Setting up a new repo for agent-first development
• Upgrading an existing repo's AGENTS.md to table-of-contents style
• Adding architectural lint enforcement to a repo
• Any repo where agents are doing most of the coding

Supported Languages

• Rust (Substrate pallets, cargo workspace)
• Go (internal/ package structure)
• TypeScript (src/, npm)
• Python (pyproject.toml, uv/pytest) ← added 2026-03-09

Usage

SKILL_DIR="$HOME/.openclaw/workspace/skills/harness"

# Scaffold harness for a repo (language auto-detected: Rust/Go/TypeScript/Python)
uv run python "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/scaffold.py" --repo /path/to/repo

# Scaffold with force-overwrite of existing AGENTS.md
uv run python "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/scaffold.py" --repo /path/to/repo --force

# Audit harness freshness (tool lifecycle check — no writes)
uv run python "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/scaffold.py" --repo /path/to/repo --audit

# Run lints locally
bash /path/to/repo/scripts/agent-lint.sh

# Check doc freshness (finds stale references in docs/)
uv run python "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/doc_garden.py" --repo /path/to/repo --dry-run

# Check doc freshness and open a fix PR
uv run python "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/doc_garden.py" --repo /path/to/repo --pr

# Generate execution plan for a complex task
uv run python "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/plan.py" \
  --task "Add IBC timeout handling" \
  --repo /path/to/repo

What gets created

AGENTS.md

docs/ARCHITECTURE.md

docs/QUALITY.md

docs/CONVENTIONS.md

docs/COORDINATION.md

docs/RESILIENCE.md

docs/EXECUTION_PLAN_TEMPLATE.md

scripts/agent-lint.sh

.github/workflows/agent-lint.yml

Lint error format

Every lint error produced by

scripts/agent-lint.sh

LINT ERROR [<rule-id>]: <description of the problem>
  WHAT: <why this is a problem>
  FIX:  <exact steps to resolve it>
  REF:  <which doc to consult>

This means agents can read lint output and fix problems without asking a human.

Agent Design Checklist (from tool design guidelines)

Before shipping any tool or skill change, verify:

• Is the tool shaped to what this model can actually do?
• Does it schema-enforce structured output where correctness matters?
• Is context loaded progressively (L1→L2→L3), not dumped upfront?
• Does it support multi-agent coordination if needed? (see COORDINATION.md)
• Have you measured model affinity (call frequency) vs just output quality?
• Is the total tool count at or below your ceiling? (target: ≤ 20 per agent)
• Do you have a plan to revisit this tool as model capabilities change?

Progressive Disclosure Layers

The harness enforces a 3-layer context discipline:

AGENTS.md

docs/

Rule: Start with L1. Pull L2 before touching code. Pull L3 only when you need it. Never pre-load all three layers — it crowds out working context.

Tool Lifecycle (--audit)

Run

--audit

• AGENTS.md has depth layer markers
• COORDINATION.md present (multi-agent support)
• Lint script uses current language tooling
• Python: ruff + pyright checks present
• AGENTS.md under 150 lines

Safety

• Never overwrites existing AGENTS.md without

  --force

  flag
• Reads existing code structure before generating docs (no hallucinated APIs)
• All writes are previewed in

  --dry-run

  mode before committing

References

• OpenAI Codex harness engineering
• Agent Tool Design Guidelines
• ClawChain harness PR
• EvoClaw harness PR