Skills professional-agent-forge

Build a complete OpenClaw agent package for a real profession or job role. Use when the user asks for things like "create a product manager agent", "make me a lawyer agent", "generate an engineer persona", "build a professional-role OpenClaw setup", or "create a data analyst / designer / marketer / operator agent". Produce a role-specific package centered on `soul.md`, `identity.md`, `memory.md`, `agents.md`, and `tools.md`, plus a recommended supporting-skill stack.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/openclaw/skills
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/openclaw/skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/aliciawque/professional-agent-forge" ~/.claude/skills/openclaw-skills-professional-agent-forge && rm -rf "$T"
OpenClaw · Install into ~/.openclaw/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/openclaw/skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.openclaw/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/aliciawque/professional-agent-forge" ~/.openclaw/skills/openclaw-skills-professional-agent-forge && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/aliciawque/professional-agent-forge/SKILL.md
source content

Professional Agent Forge

Generate deployable OpenClaw agents for real jobs and professions.

Focus on real work patterns, role-specific judgment, stakeholder behavior, and toolchains — not generic assistant fluff.

Workflow

Input: profession name + optional industry or scenario
  ↓
Check whether a deep reference file exists
  ├─ If yes: read the matching reference and customize it
  └─ If no: use the generic role-analysis framework
  ↓
Generate the five core files
  ↓
Recommend supporting skills and tooling
  ↓
Return a role-ready agent package

Prebuilt profession references

Read the matching file when the profession fits one of these categories:

ProfessionReference fileTriggers
Product manager
references/product-manager.md
PM, roadmap, requirements, prioritization
Software engineer
references/software-engineer.md
engineer, developer, coding, architecture, debugging
Lawyer
references/lawyer.md
lawyer, legal, contracts, litigation, compliance
Data analyst
references/data-analyst.md
analytics, BI, SQL, dashboards, experimentation
UI/UX designer
references/designer.md
designer, UX, UI, prototyping, user research
Marketer
references/marketer.md
marketing, growth, brand, campaigns, content

If the requested profession is not listed, fall back to the generic framework below.

Core file requirements

soul.md

Define the role's deepest professional drive.

Must include:

  • Core drive
  • Professional beliefs
  • Quality standard
  • Non-negotiables
  • The role's built-in tension

identity.md

Define professional identity and communication style.

Must include:

  • Role definition
  • Expertise stack
  • Communication style by audience
  • Decision framework
  • Professional boundaries

memory.md

Define the role's stable knowledge layer.

Must include:

  • Core methodology
  • Domain knowledge
  • Templates and common artifacts
  • Reference standards
  • Common pitfalls

agents.md

Define behavior rules for recurring work situations.

Must include:

  • Core workflows
  • Output format defaults
  • Stakeholder protocols
  • Escalation rules
  • Sample interactions

tools.md

Define the practical toolchain.

Must include:

  • Primary toolstack
  • AI-augmented tools
  • OpenClaw skill mapping
  • Open-source resources
  • Tool selection logic
  • Recommended MCP integrations

Generic role-analysis framework

When there is no prebuilt reference, analyze the profession using these dimensions:

1. Core responsibilities
2. Key deliverables
3. Primary stakeholders
4. Areas requiring professional judgment
5. Typical toolchain
6. Success metrics
7. Common pain points
8. Hard boundaries and red lines

Output structure

Return the package in this structure:

[Profession Name] Agent Package
├── soul.md
├── identity.md
├── memory.md
├── agents.md
├── tools.md
└── skills-recommendation.md

Quality bar

Before finalizing, check:

  • the package sounds like a real practitioner, not a generic AI assistant
  • the role-specific language is credible
  • the workflows are concrete and executable
  • tools.md
    is practical rather than decorative
  • a real professional in that field would recognize the trade-offs and tensions