Audit Dependency Versions

Audit project dependencies for version staleness, known security vulnerabilities, and compatibility issues. This skill inventories all dependencies from lock files, checks each against the latest available version, classifies staleness levels, identifies security concerns, and produces a prioritized upgrade report with recommended actions.

Cuándo Usar

• Before a release to ensure dependencies are current and secure
• During periodic maintenance (monthly or quarterly dependency reviews)
• After receiving a security advisory affecting a project dependency
• When upgrading a project to a new language version (e.g., R 4.4 to 4.5)
• Before submitting a package to CRAN, npm, or crates.io
• When inheriting a project and assessing its dependency health

Entradas

• Requerido: Project root directory containing dependency/lock files
• Opcional: Ecosystem type if not auto-detectable (R, Node.js, Python, Rust)
• Opcional: Security-only mode flag (skip staleness, focus on CVEs)
• Opcional: Allowlist of dependencies to skip (known acceptable older versions)
• Opcional: Target date for compatibility (e.g., "must work with R 4.4.x")

Procedimiento

Paso 1: Inventory All Dependencies

Locate and parse dependency files to build a complete inventory.

R packages:

# Direct dependencies from DESCRIPTION
grep -A 100 "^Imports:" DESCRIPTION | grep -B 100 "^[A-Z]" | head -50
grep -A 100 "^Suggests:" DESCRIPTION | grep -B 100 "^[A-Z]" | head -50

# Pinned versions from renv.lock
cat renv.lock | grep -A 3 '"Package"'

Node.js:

# Direct dependencies
cat package.json | grep -A 100 '"dependencies"' | grep -B 100 "}"
cat package.json | grep -A 100 '"devDependencies"' | grep -B 100 "}"

# Pinned versions from lock file
cat package-lock.json | grep '"version"' | head -20

Python:

# From requirements or pyproject
cat requirements.txt
cat pyproject.toml | grep -A 50 "dependencies"

# Pinned versions
cat requirements.lock 2>/dev/null || pip freeze

Rust:

# From Cargo.toml
grep -A 50 "\[dependencies\]" Cargo.toml
# Pinned versions
cat Cargo.lock | grep -A 2 "name ="

Build an inventory table:

| Package | Pinned Version | Type | Ecosystem |
|---|---|---|---|
| dplyr | 1.1.4 | Import | R |
| testthat | 3.2.1 | Suggests | R |
| express | 4.18.2 | dependency | Node.js |
| pytest | 8.0.0 | dev | Python |

Esperado: Complete inventory of all direct and (optionally) transitive dependencies with pinned versions.

En caso de fallo: If lock files are missing, the project has reproducibility issues. Note this as a finding and inventory from the manifest file (DESCRIPTION, package.json) using declared version constraints instead of pinned versions.

Paso 2: Check Latest Available Versions

For each dependency, determine the latest available version.

R:

# Check available versions
available.packages()[c("dplyr", "testthat"), "Version"]

# Or via CLI
Rscript -e 'cat(available.packages()["dplyr", "Version"])'

Node.js:

# Check outdated packages
npm outdated --json

# Or individual package
npm view express version

Python:

# Check outdated
pip list --outdated --format=json

# Or individual
pip index versions requests 2>/dev/null

Rust:

# Check outdated
cargo outdated

# Or individual
cargo search serde --limit 1

Update the inventory with latest versions:

| Package | Pinned | Latest | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| dplyr | 1.1.4 | 1.1.6 | patch |
| ggplot2 | 3.4.0 | 3.5.1 | minor |
| Rcpp | 1.0.10 | 1.0.14 | patch |
| shiny | 1.7.4 | 1.9.1 | minor |

Esperado: Latest version identified for each dependency with the gap magnitude (patch/minor/major).

En caso de fallo: If a package registry is unreachable, note the dependency as "unable to check" and proceed with the rest. Do not block the entire audit on one unreachable registry.

Paso 3: Classify Staleness

Assign a staleness level to each dependency:

Level	Definition	Action
Current	At latest version or within latest patch	No action needed
Patch behind	Same major.minor, older patch	Low priority upgrade, usually safe
Minor behind	Same major, older minor	Medium priority, review changelog for new features
Major behind	Older major version	High priority, likely breaking changes in upgrade
EOL / Archived	Package no longer maintained	Critical: find replacement or fork

Produce a staleness summary:

### Staleness Summary

- **Current**: 12 packages (48%)
- **Patch behind**: 8 packages (32%)
- **Minor behind**: 3 packages (12%)
- **Major behind**: 1 package (4%)
- **EOL/Archived**: 1 package (4%)

**Overall health**: AMBER (major-behind and EOL packages present)

Color coding:

• GREEN: All packages current or patch-behind
• AMBER: Any minor-behind or one major-behind
• RED: Multiple major-behind or any EOL packages

Esperado: Every dependency classified by staleness with an overall health rating.

En caso de fallo: If version comparison logic is ambiguous (non-SemVer versions, date-based versions), classify conservatively as "minor behind" and note the non-standard versioning.

Paso 4: Check for Security Vulnerabilities

Run ecosystem-specific security audit tools:

R:

# No built-in audit tool; check manually
# Cross-reference with https://www.r-project.org/security.html
# Check GitHub advisories for each package

Node.js:

# Built-in audit
npm audit --json

# Severity levels: info, low, moderate, high, critical
npm audit --audit-level=moderate

Python:

# Using pip-audit
pip-audit --format=json

# Or safety
safety check --json

Rust:

# Using cargo-audit
cargo audit --json

Document findings:

### Security Findings

| Package | Version | CVE | Severity | Fixed In | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| express | 4.18.2 | CVE-2024-XXXX | High | 4.19.0 | Path traversal in static file serving |
| lodash | 4.17.20 | CVE-2021-23337 | Critical | 4.17.21 | Command injection via template |

**Security status**: RED (1 critical, 1 high)

Esperado: Security vulnerabilities identified with CVE, severity, affected version, and fix version.

En caso de fallo: If no audit tool is available for the ecosystem, search GitHub Security Advisories manually for each dependency. Note that the audit is best-effort without tooling.

Paso 5: Plan Upgrade Path

Prioritize upgrades based on risk and impact:

### Upgrade Plan

#### Priority 1: Security Fixes (do immediately)
| Package | Current | Target | Risk | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lodash | 4.17.20 | 4.17.21 | Low (patch) | Fixes CVE-2021-23337 |
| express | 4.18.2 | 4.19.0 | Low (minor) | Fixes CVE-2024-XXXX |

#### Priority 2: EOL Replacements (plan within 1 month)
| Package | Current | Replacement | Migration Effort |
|---|---|---|---|
| request | 2.88.2 | node-fetch 3.x | Medium (API change) |

#### Priority 3: Major Version Upgrades (plan for next release cycle)
| Package | Current | Target | Breaking Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| webpack | 4.46.0 | 5.90.0 | Config format, plugin API |

#### Priority 4: Minor/Patch Updates (batch in maintenance window)
| Package | Current | Target | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| dplyr | 1.1.4 | 1.1.6 | Patch fixes only |
| ggplot2 | 3.4.0 | 3.5.1 | New geom functions added |

For each major upgrade, note known breaking changes by checking the dependency's changelog.

Esperado: Prioritized upgrade plan with security fixes first, then EOL replacements, major upgrades, and minor/patch batches.

En caso de fallo: If a dependency has no clear upgrade path (abandoned with no fork), document the risk and recommend: (1) vendoring the current version, (2) finding an alternative package, or (3) accepting the risk with monitoring.

Paso 6: Document Compatibility Risks

For each planned upgrade, assess compatibility:

### Compatibility Assessment

#### express 4.18.2 -> 4.19.0
- **API changes**: None (patch-level fix)
- **Node.js requirement**: Same (>=14)
- **Test impact**: Run full test suite; expect zero failures
- **Confidence**: HIGH

#### webpack 4.46.0 -> 5.90.0
- **API changes**: Config file format changed, several plugins removed
- **Node.js requirement**: >=10.13 (unchanged)
- **Test impact**: Build configuration must be rewritten; all tests need re-run
- **Confidence**: LOW (requires dedicated migration effort)
- **Migration guide**: https://webpack.js.org/migrate/5/

Write the complete audit report to

DEPENDENCY-AUDIT.md

or

DEPENDENCY-AUDIT-2026-02-17.md

.

Esperado: Compatibility risks documented for each significant upgrade. Complete audit report written.

En caso de fallo: If compatibility cannot be assessed without testing, recommend a branch-based upgrade approach: create a branch, apply the upgrade, run tests, and evaluate results before merging.

Validación

• All direct dependencies inventoried from lock/manifest files
• Latest available version checked for each dependency
• Staleness level assigned (current / patch / minor / major / EOL)
• Overall health rating calculated (GREEN / AMBER / RED)
• Security audit run with ecosystem-appropriate tooling
• All CVEs documented with severity, affected version, and fix version
• Upgrade plan prioritized: security > EOL > major > minor/patch
• Compatibility risks assessed for each major upgrade
• Audit report written to DEPENDENCY-AUDIT.md
• No dependencies left as "unable to check" without documented reason

Errores Comunes

• Ignoring transitive dependencies: A project may have 10 direct dependencies but 200 transitive ones. Security vulnerabilities often hide in transitive dependencies. Use

  npm ls

  or

  renv::dependencies()

  to see the full tree.

• Upgrading everything at once: Batch-upgrading all dependencies in one commit makes it impossible to identify which upgrade caused a regression. Upgrade in logical groups (security first, then majors individually, then minors/patches as a batch).

• Confusing "outdated" with "insecure": A package one major version behind with no CVEs is lower risk than a current package with a critical vulnerability. Always prioritize security over freshness.

• Not reading changelogs: Blindly upgrading a major version without reading the changelog. Breaking changes in the dependency become breaking changes in your project.

• Audit fatigue: Running audits but not acting on findings. Set a policy: security findings must be addressed within 1 sprint, EOL within 1 quarter.

• Missing lock files: Projects without lock files have non-reproducible builds. If the audit reveals missing lock files, that is itself a critical finding to address before versioned upgrades.

• Wrong R binary on hybrid systems: On WSL or Docker,

  Rscript

  may resolve to a cross-platform wrapper instead of native R. Check with

  which Rscript && Rscript --version

  . Prefer the native R binary (e.g.,

  /usr/local/bin/Rscript

  on Linux/WSL) for reliability. See Setting Up Your Environment for R path configuration.

Habilidades Relacionadas

• apply-semantic-versioning

  -- Version bumps may be triggered by dependency upgrades

• manage-renv-dependencies

  -- R-specific dependency management with renv

• security-audit-codebase

  -- Broader security audit that includes dependency vulnerabilities

• manage-changelog

  -- Document dependency upgrades in the changelog

• plan-release-cycle

  -- Schedule dependency upgrades within the release timeline