Agent-almanac plan-capacity
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/i18n/zh-CN/skills/plan-capacity" ~/.claude/skills/pjt222-agent-almanac-plan-capacity-012ff6 && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
i18n/zh-CN/skills/plan-capacity/SKILL.mdsource content
Plan Capacity
通过数据驱动的容量规划预测资源需求并防止饱和。
适用场景
- 季节性流量高峰前(节假日、促销活动)
- 规划新功能发布时
- 季度容量审查期间
- 资源利用率呈上升趋势时
- 预算规划周期前
输入
- 必填:历史指标(CPU、内存、磁盘、网络、每秒请求数)
- 必填:趋势分析时间范围(最少 4 周)
- 可选:业务增长预测(预期用户增长、功能发布)
- 可选:预算约束
步骤
第 1 步:收集历史指标
查询 Prometheus 获取关键资源指标:
# CPU usage trend over 8 weeks avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m])) by (instance) # Memory usage trend avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes - node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes) by (instance) # Disk usage growth avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes - node_filesystem_free_bytes) by (instance, device) # Request rate growth sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m])) by (service) # Database connection pool usage avg(db_connection_pool_used / db_connection_pool_max) by (instance)
导出以供分析:
# Export 8 weeks of CPU data curl -G 'http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/query_range' \ --data-urlencode 'query=avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m])) by (instance)' \ --data-urlencode 'start=2024-12-15T00:00:00Z' \ --data-urlencode 'end=2025-02-09T00:00:00Z' \ --data-urlencode 'step=1h' | jq '.data.result' > cpu_8weeks.json
预期结果: 每个资源的清洁时间序列数据,无大量缺口。
失败处理: 数据缺失会降低预测准确性。检查指标保留期和抓取间隔。
第 2 步:使用 predict_linear 计算增长率
使用 Prometheus 的
predict_linear() 预测饱和时间:
# Predict when CPU will hit 80% (4 weeks ahead) predict_linear( avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))[8w:], 4*7*24*3600 # 4 weeks in seconds ) > 0.80 # Predict disk full date (8 weeks ahead) predict_linear( avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes - node_filesystem_free_bytes)[8w:], 8*7*24*3600 ) > 0.95 * avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes) # Predict memory pressure (2 weeks ahead) predict_linear( avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes - node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes)[8w:], 2*7*24*3600 ) / avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes) > 0.90 # Predict request rate capacity breach (4 weeks ahead) predict_linear( sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))[8w:], 4*7*24*3600 ) > 10000 # known capacity limit
创建预测仪表板:
{ "dashboard": { "title": "Capacity Forecast", "panels": [ { "title": "CPU Saturation Forecast (4 weeks)", "targets": [ { "expr": "predict_linear(avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!=\"idle\"}[5m]))[8w:], 4*7*24*3600)", "legendFormat": "Predicted CPU" }, { "expr": "0.80", "legendFormat": "Target Threshold (80%)" } ] }, { "title": "Disk Full Date", "targets": [ { "expr": "(avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes) - predict_linear(avg(node_filesystem_free_bytes)[8w:], 8*7*24*3600)) / avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes)", "legendFormat": "Predicted Usage %" } ] } ] } }
预期结果: 清晰可视化,显示资源何时将突破阈值。
失败处理: 如果预测看起来错误(负值、剧烈波动),检查:
- 历史数据不足(需要最少 4 周)
- 部署、迁移等导致的阶跃变化扭曲趋势
- 线性模型未捕获的季节性模式
第 3 步:计算当前余量
确定饱和前的安全余量:
# CPU headroom (percentage remaining before 80% threshold) (0.80 - avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))) / 0.80 * 100 # Memory headroom (bytes remaining before 90% usage) avg(node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes) - (avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes) * 0.10) # Request rate headroom (requests/sec before saturation) 10000 - sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m])) # Time until saturation (weeks until CPU hits 80%) (0.80 - avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))) / deriv(avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))[8w:]) / (7*24*3600)
创建余量摘要报告:
cat > capacity_headroom.md <<'EOF' # Capacity Headroom Report (2025-02-09) ## Current Utilization - **CPU**: 45% average (target: <80%) - **Memory**: 62% (target: <90%) - **Disk**: 71% (target: <95%) - **Request Rate**: 4,200 req/s (capacity: 10,000) ## Headroom Analysis - **CPU**: 35% headroom → ~12 weeks until saturation - **Memory**: 28% headroom → ~16 weeks until saturation - **Disk**: 24% headroom → ~8 weeks until full - **Request Rate**: 5,800 req/s headroom → ~20 weeks until capacity ## Priority Actions 1. **Disk**: Implement log rotation or expand volume within 4 weeks 2. **CPU**: Plan horizontal scaling in next quarter 3. **Memory**: Monitor but no immediate action needed EOF
预期结果: 每个资源的量化余量,包含饱和时间估算。
失败处理: 如果余量已经为负,则处于响应式模式。需要立即扩容。
第 4 步:建立增长场景模型
将业务预测纳入考量:
# Example Python script for scenario modeling import pandas as pd import numpy as np # Load historical data df = pd.read_json('cpu_8weeks.json') # Calculate weekly growth rate growth_rate_weekly = df['value'].pct_change(periods=7).mean() # Scenario 1: Current trend weeks_ahead = 12 current_trend = df['value'].iloc[-1] * (1 + growth_rate_weekly) ** weeks_ahead # Scenario 2: 2x user growth (marketing campaign) accelerated_trend = df['value'].iloc[-1] * (1 + growth_rate_weekly * 2) ** weeks_ahead # Scenario 3: New feature launch (+30% baseline) feature_launch = (df['value'].iloc[-1] * 1.30) * (1 + growth_rate_weekly) ** weeks_ahead print(f"Current Trend (12 weeks): {current_trend:.1%} CPU") print(f"2x Growth Scenario: {accelerated_trend:.1%} CPU") print(f"Feature Launch Scenario: {feature_launch:.1%} CPU") print(f"Threshold: 80%")
预期结果: 多个场景显示业务变化对容量的影响。
失败处理: 如果场景超出容量,在事件发生前优先扩容。
第 5 步:生成扩容建议
创建可操作的建议:
## Capacity Scaling Plan ### Immediate Actions (Next 4 Weeks) 1. **Disk Expansion** [Priority: HIGH] - Current: 500GB, 71% used - Projected full date: 2025-04-01 (8 weeks) - Action: Expand to 1TB by 2025-03-15 - Cost: $50/month additional - Justification: 5 weeks lead time needed 2. **Log Rotation Policy** [Priority: MEDIUM] - Current: Logs retained 90 days - Action: Reduce to 30 days, archive to S3 - Savings: ~150GB disk space - Cost: $5/month S3 storage ### Near-Term Actions (Next Quarter) 3. **Horizontal Scaling - API Tier** [Priority: MEDIUM] - Current: 4 instances, 45% CPU - Projected: 65% CPU by 2025-05-01 - Action: Add 2 instances (to 6 total) - Cost: $400/month - Trigger: When CPU avg exceeds 60% for 7 days 4. **Database Connection Pool** [Priority: LOW] - Current: 50 max connections, 40% used - Projected: 55% by Q3 - Action: Increase to 75 in Q2 - Cost: None (configuration change) ### Long-Term Planning (Next 6 Months) 5. **Migration to Auto-Scaling** [Priority: MEDIUM] - Current: Manual scaling - Action: Implement Kubernetes HPA (Horizontal Pod Autoscaler) - Timeline: Q3 2025 - Benefit: Automatic response to load spikes
预期结果: 优先列表,包含成本、时间线和触发条件。
失败处理: 如果建议因成本被拒绝,重新审视阈值或接受风险。
第 6 步:设置容量告警
为低余量创建告警:
# capacity_alerts.yml groups: - name: capacity interval: 1h rules: - alert: CPUCapacityLow expr: | (0.80 - avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))) / 0.80 < 0.20 for: 24h labels: severity: warning annotations: summary: "CPU headroom below 20%" description: "Current CPU headroom: {{ $value | humanizePercentage }}. Scaling needed within 4 weeks." - alert: DiskFillForecast expr: | predict_linear(avg(node_filesystem_free_bytes)[8w:], 4*7*24*3600) < 0.10 * avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes) for: 1h labels: severity: warning annotations: summary: "Disk projected to fill within 4 weeks" description: "Expand disk volume soon." - alert: MemoryCapacityLow expr: | avg(node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes) < 0.15 * avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes) for: 6h labels: severity: warning annotations: summary: "Memory headroom below 15%"
预期结果: 告警在饱和前触发,留出主动扩容的时间。
失败处理: 如果告警触发过于频繁(告警疲劳)或过晚(被动应急),调整阈值。
验证清单
- 历史指标覆盖至少 8 周
-
查询返回合理的预测(无负值)predict_linear() - 为所有关键资源计算了余量
- 增长场景包含业务预测
- 扩容建议包含成本和时间线
- 容量告警已配置和测试
- 报告已与工程领导和财务团队审查
常见问题
- 历史数据不足:线性预测需要 4 周以上数据。数据不足时,预测不可靠。
- 忽略阶跃变化:部署、迁移或功能发布会产生扭曲趋势的峰值。过滤或添加注解。
- 线性假设:并非所有增长都是线性的。指数增长(病毒式产品)需要不同的模型。
- 忘记交付时间:云端配置很快,但采购、预算和迁移需要数周。提前规划。
- 没有预算对齐:没有预算支持的容量规划会导致最后时刻的手忙脚乱。尽早让财务参与。
相关技能
- 收集用于容量规划的指标setup-prometheus-monitoring
- 可视化预测和余量build-grafana-dashboards
- 平衡容量规划与成本优化optimize-cloud-costs