Asi energy-dynamics-acset

Energy Dynamics ACSet: Physics of Computational Skills

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/plurigrid/asi
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/plurigrid/asi "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/energy-dynamics-acset" ~/.claude/skills/plurigrid-asi-energy-dynamics-acset && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/energy-dynamics-acset/SKILL.md
source content

Energy Dynamics ACSet: Physics of Computational Skills

Trit: 0 (ERGODIC - bridges latent schema structure with active skill deployment)

Location:

/Users/bob/ies/energy-dynamics-acset/

Version: 1.0 (Formal, following Patterson et al. 2022)

Status: Mathematical framework complete; ready for Plurigrid ASI integration


Overview

The Energy Dynamics ACSet integrates three complementary frameworks for measuring and composing computational skills through physics-motivated information theory:

  1. Patterson, Lynch, Fairbanks (2022): Categorical Data Structures for Technical Computing

    • ACsets as practical relational data structures
    • Functorial data migration between schemas
    • Slice category theory (Theorem 2) ensuring categorical limits/colimits
  2. Matteo Capucci (2024): Organizing Physics with Open Energy-Driven Systems (arXiv:2404.16140)

    • Symmetric monoidal categories of open systems
    • Reaction structures: T*Q → TQ (cotangent-to-tangent transformations)
    • Hamiltonian mechanics for systems with external energy sources
  3. Sophie Libkind (2024+): Dynamical Systems Composition and Pendulum Dynamics

    • Phase space trajectories for system states
    • Compositional wiring of interaction networks
    • Pendulum-like oscillation between latent and active modes

Core Insight

Skills in an ecosystem oscillate between:

  • Latent Mode: High potential energy, low kinetic energy (schema-rich, inactive, storing capacity)
  • Active Mode: High kinetic energy, low potential energy (actively deployed, dissipating, in interaction)

This oscillation is governed by Hamiltonian mechanics: total energy H = T + V is conserved along trajectories, even as kinetic and potential exchange.


Mathematical Schema

Formal Definition

@present TheoryEnergyDynamics(FreeSchema) begin
    # S₀: Objects (combinatorial structure)
    (Skill, EnergyFlow, DynamicalState, ReactionStructure, Trit, TimePoint)::Ob

    # S₁: Morphisms (relational structure)
    energy_source::Hom(EnergyFlow, Skill)
    energy_sink::Hom(EnergyFlow, Skill)
    current_state::Hom(Skill, DynamicalState)
    next_state::Hom(DynamicalState, DynamicalState)
    reaction::Hom(Skill, ReactionStructure)
    time_step::Hom(DynamicalState, TimePoint)
    trit_assignment::Hom(Skill, Trit)

    # S₂: Attributes (immutable external data)
    Float::AttrType
    Int::AttrType
    String::AttrType

    # Kinetic energy attributes (interaction entropy signatures)
    entropy_rate::Attr(EnergyFlow, Float)           # dS/dt (dissipation rate)
    interaction_degree::Attr(EnergyFlow, Int)       # |concurrent_interactions|
    bandwidth_utilization::Attr(EnergyFlow, Float)  # % of capacity

    # Potential energy attributes (schema representational richness)
    schema_complexity::Attr(Skill, Float)           # cyclomatic complexity
    representational_depth::Attr(Skill, Int)        # nesting in hierarchy
    storage_footprint::Attr(Skill, Int)             # bytes (resource awareness)

    # Phase space coordinates
    kinetic_energy::Attr(DynamicalState, Float)     # T = (1/2)mv²
    potential_energy::Attr(DynamicalState, Float)   # V = mgh
    hamiltonian::Attr(DynamicalState, Float)        # H = T + V

    # Capucci reaction structure (cotangent-to-tangent map)
    cotangent_contribution::Attr(ReactionStructure, Float)  # T*Q component
    tangent_contribution::Attr(ReactionStructure, Float)    # TQ component
    reaction_rate::Attr(ReactionStructure, Float)           # dq/dt coupling

    # Temporal and categorical data
    timestamp::Attr(TimePoint, Float)
    trit_value::Attr(Trit, Int)                     # -1, 0, +1
    trit_name::Attr(Trit, String)                   # "MINUS", "ERGODIC", "PLUS"
end

@acset_type EnergyDynamicsACSet(TheoryEnergyDynamics)

Key Property (Theorem 2, Patterson et al.)

The category

AcsetᵈK
is isomorphic to a slice category:

AcsetᵈK ≅ SetC / D

This ensures:

  • ✓ All finite limits and colimits exist
  • ✓ Geometric morphism to presheaf category
  • ✓ Functorial operations on data migration between schemas
  • ✓ Composition via structured cospans (open systems)

Energy Measurement Framework

Kinetic Information Energy

Definition: Energy dissipated at system boundary (current interaction rate)

K = entropy_rate × interaction_degree × bandwidth_utilization

Semantics:

  • entropy_rate
    (dS/dt): Information dissipation per unit time at boundary
  • interaction_degree
    : Number of simultaneous concurrent interactions
  • bandwidth_utilization
    : Fraction of available capacity currently active

Interpretation: Higher K means skill is currently being exercised intensively.

Physical Analogy: (dS/dt) is entropy production in open thermodynamic system.

Potential Information Energy

Definition: Latent representational capacity stored in schema

V = schema_complexity × representational_depth

Semantics:

  • schema_complexity
    : Measure of structural richness (cyclomatic complexity, morphism count)
  • representational_depth
    : Nesting levels in categorical hierarchy

Interpretation: Richer schemas enable more diverse future computations.

Physical Analogy: Height in gravitational field; complexity acts like mass.

Total Energy (Hamiltonian)

H = K + V = constant (along skill trajectories)

Conservation Law: Total information energy is preserved as skills oscillate between latent and active modes.

Implementation:

function is_energy_conserving(acset, state_id; tolerance=1e-6)
    H = acset[state_id, :hamiltonian]
    computed_H = acset[state_id, :kinetic_energy] + acset[state_id, :potential_energy]
    return abs(H - computed_H) < tolerance
end

Resource Efficiency Metric

energy_density = K / storage_footprint  (bits/byte/second)

Interpretation: Skills with high energy density should be prioritized for deployment.


Hamiltonian Dynamics for Skills

Pendulum Oscillation

A skill oscillates between two extremes:

Mode 1 (Latent):  K ≈ 0.1,  V ≈ 0.9  (top of swing)
                  Schema-rich, inactive, storing energy

Mode 2 (Active):  K ≈ 0.9,  V ≈ 0.1  (bottom of swing)
                  Actively deployed, high interaction, dissipating

Symplectic Integration

The reaction structure (Capucci) couples latent and active modes through reaction rate α:

function hamiltonian_dynamics_step(acset, state_id, dt)
    T = acset[state_id, :kinetic_energy]
    V = acset[state_id, :potential_energy]
    H = acset[state_id, :hamiltonian]

    # Get reaction structure for this skill's state
    skill = acset[state_id, :current_state]
    reaction_id = acset[skill, :reaction]
    α = acset[reaction_id, :reaction_rate]

    # Harmonic coupling: energy oscillates
    # dT/dt = α(V - T),  dV/dt = α(T - V)
    dT = α * (V - T) * dt
    dV = α * (T - V) * dt

    return T + dT, V + dV, H  # Hamiltonian stays constant!
end

Period Calculation

ω = sqrt(reaction_rate)           (angular frequency)
T_period = 2π / ω                 (oscillation period)

Example: Skill with reaction_rate = 0.5 → ω = 0.707 rad/s → period ≈ 8.9 seconds


GF(3) Triadic Organization

The schema supports balanced triadic groups (GF(3) arithmetic):

MINUS (-1):   dissipative, energy-sinking
ERGODIC (0):  coordinating, energy-neutral
PLUS (+1):    generative, energy-sourcing

Conservation Law

Σ trit_value ≡ 0 (mod 3)

Ensures triadic balance across skill ecosystem.

Role Assignment Strategy

  1. Compute
    energy_density = kinetic_energy / storage_footprint
    for each skill
  2. Sort skills by energy density
  3. Assign roles:
    • PLUS: Top 1/3 (high energy density, generative)
    • ERGODIC: Middle 1/3 (moderate, coordinating)
    • MINUS: Bottom 1/3 (low energy density, dissipative)

This ensures Σ trit ≡ 0 while balancing ecosystem load.


Integration with Plurigrid ASI (491 Skills)

Data Source

File:

gh_acset_export.json
(GitHub interaction data for Plurigrid/asi repository)

ACSet Schema:

Objects: Issue, PR, Commit, User, Repo
Morphisms: authored_by, on_repo, references, reviews

Metric Extraction

  1. entropy_rate = (PRs closed per time window) / (time window)

    • Measures boundary dissipation rate
  2. interaction_degree = |concurrent_active_contributors|

    • Count simultaneous interactions in time window
  3. schema_complexity = cyclomatic complexity of codebase/feature

    • Use tools: radon, MetricsGrimoire
  4. representational_depth = ACSet nesting level

    • Count Ob, Hom, Attr, limits, colimits in schema

Example: acset-taxonomy Skill

Current Measurements:

  • Schema complexity: 5.7 (multiple morphism types)

  • Representational depth: 7 (nested categories)

  • Storage footprint: 250 KB

  • Potential energy: V = 5.7 × 7 = 39.9

  • Concurrent usage: 39 Gay.jl color mining interactions

  • Entropy rate: 0.15 (moderate dissipation)

  • Interaction degree: 4

  • Bandwidth: 0.6

  • Kinetic energy: K = 0.15 × 4 × 0.6 = 0.36

  • Total energy: H = 0.36 + 39.9 = 40.26

  • Energy density: 0.36 / 250 = 0.00144 (bits/byte/sec)

  • Trit assignment: ERGODIC (bridges core and semantic ACsets)


Slice Category Operations

Limits and Colimits (Patterson Corollary 4-6)

Product of Skills (disjoint union):

(S₁ × S₂).K = S₁.K + S₂.K
(S₁ × S₂).V = S₁.V + S₂.V
(S₁ × S₂).H = S₁.H + S₂.H

Pullback for Filtering:

{S | energy_density(S) > threshold}

Structured Cospans (Patterson Section 4.3)

Composing Two Skills: S₁ → Shared_Interface ← S₂

apex = coequalizer(S₁.source ∘ interface, S₂.sink ∘ interface)

Energy flows through shared interface; total energy conserved by Hamiltonian.


Implementation Strategy

Step 1: Formal Schema ✓

  • Define @present TheoryEnergyDynamics (file:
    schema.jl
    )
  • Implement derived operations (kinetic, potential, total energy)
  • Create example acset with 3-skill system

Step 2: Data Integration (Next)

  • Extract contributor interaction data from gh_acset_export.json
  • Compute entropy_rate, interaction_degree from commit/PR velocity
  • Map schema structure → schema_complexity and representational_depth

Step 3: Skill Measurement (All 491 Skills)

  • Run energy calculation for each skill
  • Create kinetic/potential energy histogram
  • Identify energy outliers (hyper-active, dormant)

Step 4: Optimization (Triadic Scheduling)

  • Sort skills by (kinetic_energy / storage_footprint)
  • Assign GF(3) trits based on energy role
  • Schedule activation to balance triadic cycles

Files in This Addon

FilePurposeLines
schema.jl
Formal ACSet schema with all functions414
THEORY.md
Comprehensive integration document364
SKILL.md
This documentationTBD

Key Functions

Energy Computation

kinetic_information_energy(acset, flow_id)
latent_potential_energy(acset, skill_id)
total_energy(acset, state_id)
energy_density(acset, skill_id)

Consistency Checks

is_energy_conserving(acset, state_id; tolerance=1e-6)
gf3_conservation(acset)

Dynamics

hamiltonian_dynamics_step(acset, state_id, dt)
pendulum_trajectory(acset, skill_id, time_range)
capucci_energy_conversion_rate(acset, reaction_id)

Example

acset = create_energy_dynamics_example()
energy_report(acset)

References

Primary Sources

  1. Patterson, E., Lynch, O., & Fairbanks, J. (2022) "Categorical Data Structures for Technical Computing" Compositionality 4(5), 1-27 arXiv: 2106.04703v5

  2. Capucci, M. (2024) "Organizing Physics with Open Energy-Driven Systems" arXiv: 2404.16140 Submitted to Applied Category Theory

  3. Libkind, S. (2024+) Research on dynamical systems composition, interaction nets, and operad structures Profile

Related Work

  • Baez, J. C., & Courser, K. (2020). "Structured cospans." Theory and Applications of Categories, 35(48), 1771-1822.
  • Spivak, D. I. (2012). "Functorial data migration." Information and Computation, 217, 31-51.
  • Fong, B. (2015). "Decorated cospans." Theory and Applications of Categories, 30(33), 1096-1120.

Integration Notes

This addon provides the mathematical foundation for the Plurigrid ASI skill ecosystem:

  • Measurement: Every skill gets (K, V, H) energy values + GF(3) trit assignment
  • Conservation: Hamiltonian invariant ensures physical consistency
  • Composition: Structured cospans enable skill wiring diagrams
  • Optimization: Energy density ranking guides deployment scheduling

The schema bridges pure category theory (Patterson) with applied physics (Capucci) through dynamical systems (Libkind), enabling data-driven measurement of abstract computational capabilities.


Generated: 2026-01-01 Status: Formal mathematical framework complete; ready for Plurigrid ASI integration Next: Extract metrics from gh_acset_export.json and compute energies for all 491 skills