Asi yoneda-directed

Directed Yoneda lemma as directed path induction. Riehl-Shulman's key insight for synthetic ∞-categories.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/plurigrid/asi
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/plurigrid/asi "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/ies/music-topos/.codex/skills/yoneda-directed" ~/.claude/skills/plurigrid-asi-yoneda-directed && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: ies/music-topos/.codex/skills/yoneda-directed/SKILL.md
source content

Directed Yoneda Skill

"The dependent Yoneda lemma is a directed analogue of path induction." — Emily Riehl & Michael Shulman

The Key Insight

Standard HoTTDirected HoTT
Path inductionDirected path induction
Yoneda for ∞-groupoidsDependent Yoneda for ∞-categories
Types have identitySegal types have composition

Core Definition (Rzk)

#lang rzk-1

-- Dependent Yoneda lemma
-- To prove P(x, f) for all x : A and f : hom A a x,
-- it suffices to prove P(a, id_a)

#define dep-yoneda
  (A : Segal-type) (a : A)
  (P : (x : A) → hom A a x → U)
  (base : P a (id a))
  : (x : A) → (f : hom A a x) → P x f
  := λ x f. transport-along-hom P f base

-- This is "directed path induction"
#define directed-path-induction := dep-yoneda

Chemputer Semantics

Chemical Interpretation:

  • To prove a property of all reaction products from starting material A,
  • It suffices to prove it for A itself (the identity "null reaction")
  • Directed induction propagates the property along all reaction pathways

GF(3) Triad

yoneda-directed (-1) ⊗ elements-infinity-cats (0) ⊗ synthetic-adjunctions (+1) = 0 ✓
yoneda-directed (-1) ⊗ cognitive-superposition (0) ⊗ curiosity-driven (+1) = 0 ✓

As Validator (-1), yoneda-directed verifies:

  • Properties propagate correctly along morphisms
  • Base case at identity suffices
  • Induction principle is sound

Theorem

For any Segal type A, element a : A, and type family P,
if we have base : P(a, id_a), then for all x : A and f : hom(a, x),
we get P(x, f).

This is analogous to:
"To prove ∀ paths from a, prove for the reflexivity path"

References

  1. Riehl, E. & Shulman, M. (2017). "A type theory for synthetic ∞-categories." §5.
  2. Rzk sHoTT library