Asi yoneda-directed
Directed Yoneda lemma as directed path induction. Riehl-Shulman's key insight for synthetic ∞-categories.
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/plurigrid/asi
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/plurigrid/asi "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/ies/music-topos/.codex/skills/yoneda-directed" ~/.claude/skills/plurigrid-asi-yoneda-directed && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
ies/music-topos/.codex/skills/yoneda-directed/SKILL.mdsource content
Directed Yoneda Skill
"The dependent Yoneda lemma is a directed analogue of path induction." — Emily Riehl & Michael Shulman
The Key Insight
| Standard HoTT | Directed HoTT |
|---|---|
| Path induction | Directed path induction |
| Yoneda for ∞-groupoids | Dependent Yoneda for ∞-categories |
| Types have identity | Segal types have composition |
Core Definition (Rzk)
#lang rzk-1 -- Dependent Yoneda lemma -- To prove P(x, f) for all x : A and f : hom A a x, -- it suffices to prove P(a, id_a) #define dep-yoneda (A : Segal-type) (a : A) (P : (x : A) → hom A a x → U) (base : P a (id a)) : (x : A) → (f : hom A a x) → P x f := λ x f. transport-along-hom P f base -- This is "directed path induction" #define directed-path-induction := dep-yoneda
Chemputer Semantics
Chemical Interpretation:
- To prove a property of all reaction products from starting material A,
- It suffices to prove it for A itself (the identity "null reaction")
- Directed induction propagates the property along all reaction pathways
GF(3) Triad
yoneda-directed (-1) ⊗ elements-infinity-cats (0) ⊗ synthetic-adjunctions (+1) = 0 ✓ yoneda-directed (-1) ⊗ cognitive-superposition (0) ⊗ curiosity-driven (+1) = 0 ✓
As Validator (-1), yoneda-directed verifies:
- Properties propagate correctly along morphisms
- Base case at identity suffices
- Induction principle is sound
Theorem
For any Segal type A, element a : A, and type family P, if we have base : P(a, id_a), then for all x : A and f : hom(a, x), we get P(x, f). This is analogous to: "To prove ∀ paths from a, prove for the reflexivity path"
References
- Riehl, E. & Shulman, M. (2017). "A type theory for synthetic ∞-categories." §5.
- Rzk sHoTT library