Pm-skills deliver-edge-cases
Documents edge cases, error states, boundary conditions, and recovery paths for a feature. Use during specification to ensure comprehensive coverage, or during QA planning to identify test scenarios.
git clone https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/deliver-edge-cases" ~/.claude/skills/product-on-purpose-pm-skills-deliver-edge-cases && rm -rf "$T"
skills/deliver-edge-cases/SKILL.mdEdge Cases
An edge cases document systematically catalogs the unusual, boundary, and error scenarios for a feature. While happy-path flows are typically well-specified, edge cases often get discovered in production — causing bugs, poor user experience, and support burden. Documenting edge cases upfront ensures engineering handles them intentionally and QA knows what to test.
When to Use
- During feature specification before engineering begins
- When preparing QA test plans
- After discovering production bugs to prevent similar issues
- When reviewing PRDs or user stories for completeness
- Before launch to ensure error states have been designed
Instructions
When asked to document edge cases, follow these steps:
-
Define the Feature Scope Clearly describe what feature or flow you're analyzing. Edge cases are specific to context — the same input might be valid in one feature and invalid in another.
-
Walk Through Input Validation Consider every user input: What if it's empty? Too long? Wrong format? Contains special characters? What are the minimum and maximum valid values?
-
Explore Boundary Conditions Find the edges of acceptable ranges. If a field accepts 1-100, test 0, 1, 100, and 101. Consider pagination boundaries, timeout thresholds, and rate limits.
-
Map Error States Identify what can go wrong: network failures, permission denied, resource not found, concurrent modifications, expired sessions. Document both the scenario and expected behavior.
-
Consider Concurrency Issues What if two users act simultaneously? What if the user double-clicks? What if data changes between load and save? Race conditions often cause subtle bugs.
-
Define Recovery Paths For each error, specify how users recover. What message do they see? Can they retry? Is data preserved? Good error handling turns frustration into confidence.
-
Prioritize by Likelihood and Impact Not all edge cases need the same attention. High-likelihood + high-impact cases need robust handling; rare + low-impact cases might just need graceful failure.
Output Format
Use the template in
references/TEMPLATE.md to structure the output.
Quality Checklist
Before finalizing, verify:
- All user inputs have validation edge cases documented
- Boundary conditions are explicitly listed
- Network/system failure scenarios are covered
- Each error state has a defined user-facing message
- Recovery paths are specified (not just error detection)
- Edge cases are prioritized by likelihood and impact
Examples
See
references/EXAMPLE.md for a completed example.