Promptfoo promptfoo-evals
git clone https://github.com/promptfoo/promptfoo
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/promptfoo/promptfoo "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/.claude/skills/promptfoo-evals" ~/.claude/skills/promptfoo-promptfoo-promptfoo-evals && rm -rf "$T"
.claude/skills/promptfoo-evals/SKILL.mdWriting Promptfoo Evals
You produce maintainable promptfoo eval suites: clear test cases, deterministic assertions where possible, model-graded only when needed.
See
references/cheatsheet.md for the full assertion and provider reference.
For deep questions about promptfoo features, consult https://www.promptfoo.dev/llms-full.txt
Inputs (infer from repo context if not provided)
- What is being evaluated (prompt, agent, endpoint, RAG pipeline)?
- What are the inputs and outputs (text, JSON, multi-turn chat, tool calls)?
- What does "good" look like (acceptance criteria, failure modes)?
If context is insufficient, scaffold with TODO markers and starter tests.
Workflow
1. Find or create the eval suite
Search for existing configs:
promptfooconfig.yaml, promptfooconfig.yml,
or any promptfoo/evals folder. Extend existing suites when possible.
For new suites, use this layout (unless the repo uses another convention):
evals/<suite-name>/ promptfooconfig.yaml prompts/ tests/
Always add
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://promptfoo.dev/config-schema.json
at the top of config files.
2. Write prompts
- Put prompts in
(plain) orprompts/*.txt
(chat format)prompts/*.json - Reference via
file://prompts/main.txt - Use
for test inputs{{variable}} - If the app builds prompts dynamically, use a JS/Python provider instead of duplicating logic
3. Choose providers
Pick the simplest option that matches the real system:
| Scenario | Provider pattern |
|---|---|
| Compare models | , |
| Test an HTTP API | with , , and |
| Test local code | or |
| Echo/passthrough | (returns prompt as-is, useful for testing assertions) |
Keep provider count small: 1 for regression, 2 for comparison.
For JSON output, add
response_format to the provider config:
config: temperature: 0 response_format: type: json_object
4. Write tests
Use file-based tests so they scale:
tests: file://tests/*.yaml
For larger suites, use dataset-backed tests:
tests: file://tests.csv # or tests: file://generate_tests.py:create_tests
Every test should have:
- short, specificdescription
- the inputsvars
- validations (when automatable)assert
Cover: happy paths, edge cases, known regressions, safety/refusal checks, output format compliance.
5. Add assertions
Deterministic first (fast, reliable, free):
equals, contains, icontains, regex, is-json, contains-json,
starts-with, cost, latency, javascript, python
Model-graded sparingly (slow, costs money, non-deterministic):
llm-rubric, factuality, answer-relevance, context-faithfulness
Assertions support optional
weight (for scoring relative importance) and
metric (named score in reports). threshold is assertion-specific: for
graded assertions it is usually a minimum score (0-1), while for assertions
like cost/latency it is a maximum allowed value.
For model-graded assertions, explicitly set the grader provider so grading is stable across runs:
defaultTest: options: provider: openai:gpt-5-mini tests: - description: 'Model-graded quality check' assert: - type: llm-rubric value: 'Accurate and concise' # Optional per-assertion override: # provider: anthropic:messages:claude-sonnet-4-6
Hallucination / faithfulness pattern: When checking that output is grounded in source material, include the source in the rubric so the grader can compare. Use
context-faithfulness when you have
a context var, or inline the source in the llm-rubric value:
assert: - type: llm-rubric value: | The summary only states facts from this source article: "{{article}}" It does not add, infer, or fabricate any claims.
JSON output pattern:
assert: - type: is-json value: # optional JSON Schema type: object required: [name, score] - type: javascript value: 'JSON.parse(output).score >= 0.8'
Transform pattern (preprocess output before assertions): When models wrap JSON in markdown fences or add preamble text, use
options.transform on the test to clean output before assertions run:
options: transform: "output.replace(/```json\\n?|```/g, '').trim()"
Use
defaultTest for assertions shared across all tests (cost limits, format
checks, etc.).
6. Validate and run
Before finishing, validate and provide run commands. Always use
--no-cache
during development to avoid stale results. Only run eval if credentials are
available and safe to call.
npx promptfoo@latest validate -c <config> npx promptfoo@latest eval -c <config> --no-cache npx promptfoo@latest eval -c <config> -o output.json --no-cache npx promptfoo@latest view
For CI/non-UI workflows, prefer the
-o output.json command and inspect
success, score, and error fields.
If working in the promptfoo repo itself, prefer the local build:
npm run local -- validate -c <config> npm run local -- eval -c <config> --no-cache --env-file .env
Do not run
npm run local -- view unless explicitly asked.
Common mistakes
# ❌ WRONG — shell-style env vars don't work in YAML configs apiKey: $OPENAI_API_KEY # ✅ CORRECT — use Nunjucks syntax with quotes apiKey: '{{env.OPENAI_API_KEY}}'
# ❌ WRONG — rubric references "the article" but grader can't see it - type: llm-rubric value: 'Only contains info from the original article' # ✅ CORRECT — inline the source so the grader can compare - type: llm-rubric value: | Only states facts from: "{{article}}"
Output contract
When done, state:
- What the suite evaluates (1-3 bullets)
- Files created/modified (paths)
- How to run (copy-pastable commands)
- Required env vars
- TODOs left behind (only if unavoidable)