Antigravity-skills market-sizing-analysis
This skill should be used when the user asks to "calculate TAM",
git clone https://github.com/rmyndharis/antigravity-skills
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/rmyndharis/antigravity-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/market-sizing-analysis" ~/.claude/skills/rmyndharis-antigravity-skills-market-sizing-analysis && rm -rf "$T"
skills/market-sizing-analysis/SKILL.mdMarket Sizing Analysis
Comprehensive market sizing methodologies for calculating Total Addressable Market (TAM), Serviceable Available Market (SAM), and Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM) for startup opportunities.
Use this skill when
- Working on market sizing analysis tasks or workflows
- Needing guidance, best practices, or checklists for market sizing analysis
Do not use this skill when
- The task is unrelated to market sizing analysis
- You need a different domain or tool outside this scope
Instructions
- Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
- Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
- Provide actionable steps and verification.
- If detailed examples are required, open
.resources/implementation-playbook.md
Overview
Market sizing provides the foundation for startup strategy, fundraising, and business planning. Calculate market opportunity using three complementary methodologies: top-down (industry reports), bottom-up (customer segment calculations), and value theory (willingness to pay).
Core Concepts
The Three-Tier Market Framework
TAM (Total Addressable Market)
- Total revenue opportunity if achieving 100% market share
- Defines the universe of potential customers
- Used for long-term vision and market validation
- Example: All email marketing software revenue globally
SAM (Serviceable Available Market)
- Portion of TAM targetable with current product/service
- Accounts for geographic, segment, or capability constraints
- Represents realistic addressable opportunity
- Example: AI-powered email marketing for e-commerce in North America
SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market)
- Realistic market share achievable in 3-5 years
- Accounts for competition, resources, and market dynamics
- Used for financial projections and fundraising
- Example: 2-5% of SAM based on competitive landscape
When to Use Each Methodology
Top-Down Analysis
- Use when established market research exists
- Best for mature, well-defined markets
- Validates market existence and growth
- Starts with industry reports and narrows down
Bottom-Up Analysis
- Use when targeting specific customer segments
- Best for new or niche markets
- Most credible for investors
- Builds from customer data and pricing
Value Theory
- Use when creating new market categories
- Best for disruptive innovations
- Estimates based on value creation
- Calculates willingness to pay for problem solution
Three-Methodology Framework
Methodology 1: Top-Down Analysis
Start with total market size and narrow to addressable segments.
Process:
- Identify total market category from research reports
- Apply geographic filters (target regions)
- Apply segment filters (target industries/customers)
- Calculate competitive positioning adjustments
Formula:
TAM = Total Market Category Size SAM = TAM × Geographic % × Segment % SOM = SAM × Realistic Capture Rate (2-5%)
When to use: Established markets with available research (e.g., SaaS, fintech, e-commerce)
Strengths: Quick, uses credible data, validates market existence
Limitations: May overestimate for new categories, less granular
Methodology 2: Bottom-Up Analysis
Build market size from customer segment calculations.
Process:
- Define target customer segments
- Estimate number of potential customers per segment
- Determine average revenue per customer
- Calculate realistic penetration rates
Formula:
TAM = Σ (Segment Size × Annual Revenue per Customer) SAM = TAM × (Segments You Can Serve / Total Segments) SOM = SAM × Realistic Penetration Rate (Year 3-5)
When to use: B2B, niche markets, specific customer segments
Strengths: Most credible for investors, granular, defensible
Limitations: Requires detailed customer research, time-intensive
Methodology 3: Value Theory
Calculate based on value created and willingness to pay.
Process:
- Identify problem being solved
- Quantify current cost of problem (time, money, inefficiency)
- Calculate value of solution (savings, gains, efficiency)
- Estimate willingness to pay (typically 10-30% of value)
- Multiply by addressable customer base
Formula:
Value per Customer = Problem Cost × % Solved by Solution Price per Customer = Value × Willingness to Pay % (10-30%) TAM = Total Potential Customers × Price per Customer SAM = TAM × % Meeting Buy Criteria SOM = SAM × Realistic Adoption Rate
When to use: New categories, disruptive innovations, unclear existing markets
Strengths: Shows value creation, works for new markets
Limitations: Requires assumptions, harder to validate
Step-by-Step Process
Step 1: Define the Market
Clearly specify what market is being measured.
Questions to answer:
- What problem is being solved?
- Who are the target customers?
- What's the product/service category?
- What's the geographic scope?
- What's the time horizon?
Example:
- Problem: E-commerce companies struggle with email marketing automation
- Customers: E-commerce stores with >$1M annual revenue
- Category: AI-powered email marketing software
- Geography: North America initially, global expansion
- Horizon: 3-5 year opportunity
Step 2: Gather Data Sources
Identify credible data for calculations.
Top-Down Sources:
- Industry research reports (Gartner, Forrester, IDC)
- Government statistics (Census, BLS, trade associations)
- Public company filings and earnings
- Market research firms (Statista, CB Insights, PitchBook)
Bottom-Up Sources:
- Customer interviews and surveys
- Sales data and CRM records
- Industry databases (LinkedIn, ZoomInfo, Crunchbase)
- Competitive intelligence
- Academic research
Value Theory Sources:
- Customer problem quantification
- Time/cost studies
- ROI case studies
- Pricing research and willingness-to-pay surveys
Step 3: Calculate TAM
Apply chosen methodology to determine total market.
For Top-Down:
- Find total category size from research
- Document data source and year
- Apply growth rate if needed
- Validate with multiple sources
For Bottom-Up:
- Count total potential customers
- Calculate average annual revenue per customer
- Multiply to get TAM
- Break down by segment
For Value Theory:
- Quantify total addressable customer base
- Calculate value per customer
- Estimate pricing based on value
- Multiply for TAM
Step 4: Calculate SAM
Narrow TAM to serviceable addressable market.
Apply Filters:
- Geographic constraints (regions you can serve)
- Product limitations (features you currently have)
- Customer requirements (size, industry, use case)
- Distribution channel access
- Regulatory or compliance restrictions
Formula:
SAM = TAM × (% matching all filters)
Example:
- TAM: $10B global email marketing
- Geographic filter: 40% (North America)
- Product filter: 30% (e-commerce focus)
- Feature filter: 60% (need AI capabilities)
- SAM = $10B × 0.40 × 0.30 × 0.60 = $720M
Step 5: Calculate SOM
Determine realistic obtainable market share.
Consider:
- Current market share of competitors
- Typical market share for new entrants (2-5%)
- Resources available (funding, team, time)
- Go-to-market effectiveness
- Competitive advantages
- Time to achieve (3-5 years typically)
Conservative Approach:
SOM (Year 3) = SAM × 2% SOM (Year 5) = SAM × 5%
Example:
- SAM: $720M
- Year 3 SOM: $720M × 2% = $14.4M
- Year 5 SOM: $720M × 5% = $36M
Step 6: Validate and Triangulate
Cross-check using multiple methods.
Validation Techniques:
- Compare top-down and bottom-up results (should be within 30%)
- Check against public company revenues in space
- Validate customer count assumptions
- Sense-check pricing assumptions
- Review with industry experts
- Compare to similar market categories
Red Flags:
- TAM that's too small (< $1B for VC-backed startups)
- TAM that's too large (unsupported by data)
- SOM that's too aggressive (> 10% in 5 years for new entrant)
- Inconsistency between methodologies (> 50% difference)
Industry-Specific Considerations
SaaS Markets
Key Metrics:
- Number of potential businesses in target segment
- Average contract value (ACV)
- Typical market penetration rates
- Expansion revenue potential
TAM Calculation:
TAM = Total Target Companies × Average ACV × (1 + Expansion Rate)
Marketplace Markets
Key Metrics:
- Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) of category
- Take rate (% of GMV you capture)
- Total transactions or users
TAM Calculation:
TAM = Total Category GMV × Expected Take Rate
Consumer Markets
Key Metrics:
- Total addressable users/households
- Average revenue per user (ARPU)
- Engagement frequency
TAM Calculation:
TAM = Total Users × ARPU × Purchase Frequency per Year
B2B Services
Key Metrics:
- Number of target companies by size/industry
- Average project value or retainer
- Typical buying frequency
TAM Calculation:
TAM = Total Target Companies × Average Deal Size × Deals per Year
Presenting Market Sizing
For Investors
Structure:
- Market definition and problem scope
- TAM/SAM/SOM with methodology
- Data sources and assumptions
- Growth projections and drivers
- Competitive landscape context
Key Points:
- Lead with bottom-up calculation (most credible)
- Show triangulation with top-down
- Explain conservative assumptions
- Link to revenue projections
- Highlight market growth rate
For Strategy
Structure:
- Addressable customer segments
- Prioritization by opportunity size
- Entry strategy by segment
- Expected penetration timeline
- Resource requirements
Key Points:
- Focus on SAM and SOM
- Show segment-level detail
- Connect to go-to-market plan
- Identify expansion opportunities
- Discuss competitive positioning
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Mistake 1: Confusing TAM with SAM
- Don't claim entire market as addressable
- Apply realistic product/geographic constraints
- Be honest about serviceable market
Mistake 2: Overly Aggressive SOM
- New entrants rarely capture > 5% in 5 years
- Account for competition and resources
- Show realistic ramp timeline
Mistake 3: Using Only Top-Down
- Investors prefer bottom-up validation
- Top-down alone lacks credibility
- Always triangulate with multiple methods
Mistake 4: Cherry-Picking Data
- Use consistent, recent data sources
- Don't mix methodologies inappropriately
- Document all assumptions clearly
Mistake 5: Ignoring Market Dynamics
- Account for market growth/decline
- Consider competitive intensity
- Factor in switching costs and barriers
Additional Resources
Reference Files
For detailed methodologies and frameworks:
- Comprehensive guide to each methodology with step-by-step worksheetsreferences/methodology-deep-dive.md
- Curated list of market research sources, databases, and toolsreferences/data-sources.md
- Specific templates for SaaS, marketplace, consumer, B2B, and fintech marketsreferences/industry-templates.md
Example Files
Working examples with complete calculations:
- Complete TAM/SAM/SOM for a B2B SaaS productexamples/saas-market-sizing.md
- Marketplace platform market opportunity calculationexamples/marketplace-sizing.md
- Value-based market sizing for disruptive innovationexamples/value-theory-example.md
Use these examples as templates for your own market sizing analysis. Each includes real numbers, data sources, and assumptions documented clearly.
Quick Start
To perform market sizing analysis:
- Define the market - Problem, customers, category, geography
- Choose methodology - Bottom-up (preferred) or top-down + triangulation
- Gather data - Industry reports, customer data, competitive intelligence
- Calculate TAM - Apply methodology formula
- Narrow to SAM - Apply product, geographic, segment filters
- Estimate SOM - 2-5% realistic capture rate
- Validate - Cross-check with alternative methods
- Document - Show methodology, sources, assumptions
- Present - Structure for audience (investors, strategy, operations)
For detailed step-by-step guidance on each methodology, reference the files in
references/ directory. For complete worked examples, see examples/ directory.