Pro-workflow agent-teams

Coordinate multiple Claude Code sessions as a team — lead + teammates with shared task lists, mailbox messaging, and file-lock claiming. Patterns for team sizing, task decomposition, and when to use teams vs sub-agents vs worktrees.

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/rohitg00/pro-workflow
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/rohitg00/pro-workflow "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/agent-teams" ~/.claude/skills/rohitg00-pro-workflow-agent-teams && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/agent-teams/SKILL.md
source content

Agent Teams

Coordinate multiple Claude Code sessions working on the same codebase simultaneously.

Enable

export CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1
claude  # starts as team lead

The first session becomes the team lead. Subsequent sessions in the same repo join as teammates.

Architecture

Team Lead (coordinates, delegates, reviews)
  ├── Teammate 1 (owns task A, messages lead + peers)
  ├── Teammate 2 (owns task B, messages lead + peers)
  └── Teammate 3 (owns task C, messages lead + peers)
      │
      └── Shared: task list + mailbox + file locks

Key difference from subagents: Teammates are full Claude Code sessions. They have their own context window, can use all tools, and message each other directly — not just report back to a parent.

Team Sizing

Team SizeBest For
2One builds, one reviews
3-5Parallel features across layers (API, UI, tests)
> 5Coordination overhead outweighs parallelism

3-5 teammates is the productive range. Beyond that, the lead spends more time coordinating than the team saves.

Task granularity: Aim for 5-6 tasks per teammate. Fewer means underutilization; more means excessive context switching.

Display Modes

In-process navigation:

  • Shift+Down
    — cycle through teammates (wraps around)
  • See each teammate's current task and output

Split-pane (recommended for >2 teammates):

  • tmux:
    tmux split-window -h
    per teammate
  • iTerm2: Cmd+D for vertical split
  • Each pane runs its own
    claude
    session

Task Management

Tasks flow through states:

pending → in-progress → completed
              │
              └── blocked (waiting on dependency)

Task Decomposition

Break work into units that:

  • Touch non-overlapping files
  • Can be verified independently
  • Have clear done criteria

Good decomposition:

Task 1: Add rate limiting middleware (src/middleware/rate-limit.ts)
Task 2: Add rate limit tests (tests/rate-limit.test.ts)
Task 3: Update API docs for rate limit headers (docs/api.md)
Task 4: Add Redis config for rate limit store (src/config/redis.ts)

Bad decomposition:

Task 1: Implement rate limiting
Task 2: Fix rate limiting bugs
Task 3: Improve rate limiting

Dependencies

Tasks can declare dependencies:

Task 3 (API docs) → depends on Task 1 (middleware)
Task 2 (tests) → depends on Task 1 (middleware)
Task 4 (Redis config) → no dependencies

Teammates pick up unblocked tasks automatically.

File-Lock Claiming

Teammates claim files before editing to prevent conflicts:

  1. Teammate checks if file is locked
  2. If free, claims it (file-lock-based)
  3. Edits the file
  4. Releases lock on task completion

If two teammates need the same file, one waits or the lead reassigns.

Plan Approval

Teammates plan before implementing:

  1. Teammate receives task
  2. Writes a brief plan (files to change, approach)
  3. Lead reviews plan
  4. Lead approves or redirects
  5. Teammate implements

This prevents wasted work from misunderstood requirements.

Delegate Mode

Shift+Tab
toggles delegate mode for the lead:

  • Lead coordinates only — no direct code edits
  • All implementation delegated to teammates
  • Lead reviews, approves plans, manages task flow

Hook Events

HookFires When
TeammateIdleA teammate finishes its task and has no pending work
TaskCreatedNew task added to the shared list
TaskCompletedA teammate marks a task done

Use these to trigger notifications, auto-assign next tasks, or run integration tests when all tasks complete.

When to Use Teams vs Alternatives

ScenarioUse
Parallel work on non-overlapping filesAgent teams
Quick background explorationSubagent
Isolated feature branch workWorktree (
claude -w
)
Competing approaches to same problemWorktrees (compare results)
Cross-layer changes (API + UI + tests)Agent teams
One-off delegationSubagent with
isolation: worktree
Large-scale migration (20+ files)
/batch
command

Anti-Patterns

  • More than 5 teammates — coordination overhead dominates
  • Tasks that share mutable state or the same files
  • Skipping plan approval — leads to rework
  • Lead doing implementation instead of coordinating (use delegate mode)
  • Not setting dependencies — teammates race on coupled tasks

Example Session

Lead: "We need rate limiting. Breaking into 4 tasks."

  Task 1: middleware implementation → Teammate 1
  Task 2: Redis config → Teammate 2 (no deps)
  Task 3: tests → Teammate 1 (after Task 1)
  Task 4: API docs → Teammate 2 (after Task 1)

Teammate 1 plans → Lead approves → implements Task 1
Teammate 2 plans → Lead approves → implements Task 2
Task 1 completes → unblocks Tasks 3 and 4
Teammate 1 picks up Task 3, Teammate 2 picks up Task 4
All complete → Lead runs integration tests → commits

Docs

https://code.claude.com/docs/agent-teams