Scan Opportunities

Discover new feature opportunities and add them to

.feature-radar/opportunities/

.

Deep Read

<HARD-GATE> Read and follow `../feature-radar/references/DEEP-READ.md` — complete all 6 steps before proceeding. </HARD-GATE>

Behavioral Directives

<HARD-GATE> Read and follow `../feature-radar/references/DIRECTIVES.md`.

Additional directive for this skill:

• Filter aggressively — Do NOT create opportunity files for weak signals. If you can't cite concrete demand evidence, skip it. </HARD-GATE>

Brainstorm Intake

<HARD-GATE> Evaluate whether the user arrived with a vague or exploratory idea.

Enter Brainstorm Intake if ANY of these are true:

• User says "I have an idea", "what if we...", "I was thinking about...", "brainstorm"
• User describes a problem without a clear feature shape
• User's input lacks specific demand signals, impact/effort estimates, or a concrete feature name

Skip Brainstorm Intake if ALL of these are true:

• User gave a specific directive like "scan opportunities", "scan ecosystem", "find new features"
• User's input does not contain a personal idea or vague exploration

If skipping, jump directly to ## Workflow. </HARD-GATE>

Phase 1: Core Questions

Ask these one at a time. Prefer multiple-choice when possible.

1. Problem space — "What problem are you trying to solve, or what experience do you want to improve?"
   • Cross-reference: search existing

     opportunities/

     and

     archive/

     for related themes.
   • If a match is found, surface it: "Is this related to #{nn} {title}, or a completely different direction?"
2. Target user — "Who would benefit from this feature?"
   • Offer choices derived from

     base.md

     Project Context if available.
3. Spark — "What triggered this idea?"
   • (A) A pain point from my own usage
   • (B) Saw a similar feature in another tool/project
   • (C) New technical possibilities (new API, new library)
   • (D) Community/user feedback
   • (E) Pure creative exploration

Phase 2: Adaptive Depth

After Phase 1, assess idea maturity:

Mature (has clear problem + user + demand signal): → Ask 1 closing question to confirm scope, then proceed to Exit.

Emerging (has problem but fuzzy shape): → Ask up to 3 more questions to sharpen:

• "What does the usage look like in your mind?"
• "Have you seen an implementation you particularly liked?" (if yes, consider creating a

  references/

  entry)
• "What's the minimum scope that would feel useful?" (MVP scoping)

Raw (pure exploration, no clear problem yet): → Switch to open-ended dialogue. Ask up to 5 more questions:

• Explore adjacent possibilities
• Challenge assumptions: "If we don't build this, what's the biggest loss?"
• Seek demand signals: "Has anyone (including yourself) run into this problem repeatedly?"
• Stop when: a clear feature shape emerges, OR user says "enough"

Exit: Output Options

Summarize the refined idea:

"Here's a summary of our discussion:

• Problem: {problem}
• Target user: {target user}
• Direction: {feature shape}
• Demand signal: {demand evidence or 'creative exploration'}
• Related items: {related opportunities/archive/specs, or 'none found'}"

Then ask:

"What would you like to do next?"

• (A) Proceed to scan — use this direction as focused context, search all 6 sources for supporting evidence and related opportunities
• (B) Save as opportunity draft — write to

  opportunities/{nn}-{slug}.md

  with Status: Open, decide later whether to scan

If (A): Pass the summary as context into ## Workflow Step 1, with a narrowed focus on the identified direction. If (B): Create the opportunity file following

../feature-radar/references/SPEC.md

§ 3.3, populate fields from the intake summary, then run the Annotation Checkpoint per

../feature-radar/references/WORKFLOW-PATTERNS.md

. After approval, present Completion Summary and suggest "run a focused scan around this direction" as a next step.

Workflow

1. Identify sources — where to look for ideas:
   • User signals: issues, discussions, forum posts, support requests
   • Creative exploration: "what if we..." brainstorming, combining existing features in new ways
   • Ecosystem evolution: adjacent tools, emerging standards, new capabilities in dependencies
   • Technical possibilities: new APIs, libraries, or techniques that enable things previously impossible
   • Cross-project research: interesting approaches from related projects (from base.md Inspiration Sources)
   • Community conversations: Reddit, HN, Discord, blog posts
   • If Brainstorm Intake was completed: use the intake summary as the primary focus direction. Prioritize sources most relevant to the identified problem space. Still scan all 6 source types, but weight results toward the intake direction.
2. Scan and collect — for each source, look for:
   • Unmet user needs and recurring pain points
   • Feature ideas with demand signals (upvotes, comments, multiple independent asks)
   • Creative approaches that could enhance existing functionality
   • Technical breakthroughs that unlock new possibilities
   • Patterns emerging across multiple tools
3. Deduplicate — check against existing

   opportunities/

   and

   archive/

   files
4. Cross-reference codebase — for each candidate, search the project to check:
   • Already partially implemented? → mark as "Partially Done"
   • Does existing architecture support this? → note in "Design Notes"
   • Related TODOs or FIXMEs in the code? → cite them
5. Evaluate each candidate:

<HARD-GATE> Before creating any opportunity file, evaluate the candidate against ALL 6 criteria. Each criterion must be explicitly addressed — do not skip any. </HARD-GATE>

Criterion	Question
Real user demand	Are users actually asking for this, or does it solve a latent need?
Value uplift	Does this meaningfully improve the user experience or unlock new possibilities?
Innovation potential	Does this introduce a creative breakthrough or unique approach?
Effort / impact ratio	Is the cost justified by the benefit?
Architectural fit	Does it align with our core philosophy?
Ecosystem timing	Is the ecosystem ready?

6. Create opportunity files — for each viable candidate, write

   .feature-radar/opportunities/{nn}-{slug}.md

7. Checkpoint — Review & Annotate per

   ../feature-radar/references/WORKFLOW-PATTERNS.md

Present scan results using this format:

Scan complete: {n} new opportunities
| # | Opportunity | Demand Signal | Impact | Effort | Source |
|---|------------|---------------|--------|--------|--------|
| {nn} | {title} | {evidence} | H/M/L | H/M/L | {where found} |

8. Update base.md — increment opportunities count, update Value & Innovation Landscape if needed

Opportunity File Format

Use the format defined in

../feature-radar/references/SPEC.md

§ 3.3 (

opportunities/{nn}-{slug}.md

).

Guidelines

• Don't create opportunities for every idea you find. Filter aggressively — weak signal wastes attention.
• 1 issue with no comments = weak signal. Multiple independent asks = strong signal.
• Creative ideas without existing demand can still be valid — evaluate innovation potential separately.
• Write an honest "Our Position" — it's OK to say "we don't want this" or "not yet."
• Number sequentially from the highest existing number in

  opportunities/

  and

  archive/

  .
• If scanning reveals problems others have that we've already solved, add to

  references/

  instead.

Example Output

→ Created opportunities/07-streaming-output.md (Impact: High, Effort: Medium)
→ Skipped: "hook system" already exists as opportunities/03-hook-system.md
→ Updated base.md: opportunities 6 → 7

Brainstorm Intake Example

User: "I was thinking... what if we could automatically detect when a feature is getting stale?"

Phase 1:
  Q1 (Problem): "What problem are you trying to solve?" → Feature opportunities sitting unreviewed
  Cross-ref: Found #05 role-assignment — user confirms: different direction
  Q2 (Target): "Who benefits?" → Project maintainers managing backlogs
  Q3 (Spark): (A) Pain point from own usage

Phase 2 (Emerging → 2 follow-ups):
  Q4: "What does usage look like?" → Periodic check, flag items older than N days with no activity
  Q5: "Minimum useful scope?" → Just a reminder in completion summary, no automation needed

Exit summary:
  Problem: Stale opportunities go unnoticed
  Target user: Project maintainers
  Direction: Staleness detection in completion summaries
  Demand signal: Personal pain point (single user)
  Related: None found

User chose: (B) Save as opportunity draft
→ Created opportunities/06-staleness-detection.md (Impact: Low, Effort: Low)
→ Suggested next step: "run a focused scan around staleness detection"

Completion Summary

Follow the template in

../feature-radar/references/DIRECTIVES.md

, with skill name "Scan Complete".