Claude-skills technical-specification
Creates detailed technical specifications for software projects covering requirements, architecture, APIs, and testing strategies. Use when planning features, documenting system design, or creating architecture decision records.
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/secondsky/claude-skills
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/secondsky/claude-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/plugins/technical-specification/skills/technical-specification" ~/.claude/skills/secondsky-claude-skills-technical-specification && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
plugins/technical-specification/skills/technical-specification/SKILL.mdsource content
Technical Specification
Create comprehensive technical specifications for software projects.
Specification Template
# Technical Specification: [Feature Name] ## Metadata - **Status**: Draft | In Review | Approved - **Author**: [Name] - **Reviewers**: [Names] - **Last Updated**: [Date] ## Executive Summary [2-3 sentences: What problem does this solve? What's the proposed solution?] ## Background & Context - Current pain points - Why now? - Related work ## Goals ### Primary Goals 1. [Measurable goal] ### Non-Goals - [What this spec explicitly does NOT cover] ## Functional Requirements | ID | Requirement | Priority | |----|-------------|----------| | FR-1 | [Description] | P0 | | FR-2 | [Description] | P1 | ## Non-Functional Requirements - **Performance**: Response time < 200ms - **Scalability**: Support 10K concurrent users - **Availability**: 99.9% uptime - **Security**: [Requirements] ## Technical Design ### Architecture [Diagram or description] ### API Design
POST /api/v1/resource Request: { "field": "value" } Response: { "id": "123", "field": "value" }
### Database Schema ```sql CREATE TABLE resources ( id UUID PRIMARY KEY, field VARCHAR(255) );
Implementation Plan
| Phase | Timeline | Deliverables |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Week 1-2 | Core functionality |
| 2 | Week 3 | API endpoints |
| 3 | Week 4 | Testing & docs |
Testing Strategy
- Unit tests: 80% coverage
- Integration tests: API endpoints
- E2E tests: Critical flows
Risks & Mitigations
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Risk] | Medium | High | [Plan] |
Success Criteria
- All P0 requirements implemented
- Tests passing
- Performance targets met
- Documentation complete
## Full Template See [references/template.md](references/template.md) for a comprehensive copy-paste template including: - Complete metadata section - Success metrics tables - Architecture diagrams - Detailed API design sections - Security threat analysis - Monitoring & observability - Risk assessment matrix - Rollout and rollback plans - Dependencies tracking - Open questions section ## Best Practices **Do:** - Include measurable acceptance criteria - Add architecture diagrams - Define explicit API contracts - Quantify performance targets - Document risks and mitigations - Get stakeholder review before implementation - Include security considerations - Define rollback procedures **Don't:** - Use vague requirements ("fast", "scalable") - Skip non-functional requirements - Ignore security considerations - Leave alternatives unexplored - Omit testing strategy - Forget dependencies and risks