Skills solana-kit-migration
Helps developers understand when to use @solana/kit vs @solana/web3.js (v1), provides migration guidance, API mappings, and handles edge cases for Solana JavaScript SDK transitions
git clone https://github.com/sendaifun/skills
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/sendaifun/skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/solana-kit-migration" ~/.claude/skills/sendaifun-skills-solana-kit-migration && rm -rf "$T"
skills/solana-kit-migration/SKILL.mdSolana Kit Migration Assistant
This skill helps you navigate the transition between
@solana/web3.js (v1.x) and @solana/kit (formerly web3.js 2.0), providing guidance on when to use each library and how to migrate between them.
Overview
The Solana JavaScript ecosystem has two major SDK options:
| Library | Status | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
(1.x) | Maintenance mode | Legacy projects, Anchor-dependent apps |
| Active development | New projects, performance-critical apps |
Key Decision:
@solana/kit is the future, but migration isn't always straightforward.
When to Use Each Library
Use @solana/kit When:
- Starting a new project without Anchor dependencies
- Bundle size matters - Kit is tree-shakeable (26% smaller bundles)
- Performance is critical - ~200ms faster confirmation latency, 10x faster crypto ops
- Using standard programs (System, Token, Associated Token)
- Building browser applications where bundle size impacts load time
- Type safety is important - Better TypeScript support catches errors at compile time
- Using modern JavaScript - Native BigInt, WebCrypto, AsyncIterators
Use @solana/web3.js (v1.x) When:
- Using Anchor - Anchor doesn't support Kit out of the box yet
- Existing large codebase - Migration cost outweighs benefits
- Dependencies require v1 - Check if your SDKs support Kit
- Rapid prototyping - v1's OOP style may be more familiar
- Documentation/examples - More community resources for v1
Use Both (Hybrid Approach) When:
- Gradual migration - Use
for interoperability@solana/compat - Mixed dependencies - Some libs require v1, some support Kit
- Feature-by-feature migration - Convert hot paths first
Quick Decision Flowchart
START │ ├─ New project? ─────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ │ ├─ Using Anchor? ──► YES ──► Use @solana/web3.js │ │ │ │ │ └─ No Anchor? ──► Use @solana/kit │ │ │ └─ Existing project? ────────────────────────────────────┤ │ │ ├─ Performance issues? ──► Consider migration │ │ │ ├─ Bundle size issues? ──► Consider migration │ │ │ └─ Working fine? ──► Stay with current SDK │
Instructions for Migration Analysis
When a user asks about migration, follow these steps:
Step 1: Analyze Current Codebase
Run the migration analysis script to detect:
- Which SDK version is currently used
- Anchor dependencies
- Third-party SDK dependencies
- Usage patterns that need migration
# Use the analyze-migration.sh script in scripts/ ./scripts/analyze-migration.sh /path/to/project
Step 2: Check Dependencies
Look for these blocking dependencies:
or@coral-xyz/anchor
- Wait for Anchor Kit support@project-serum/anchor- SDKs that haven't migrated (check their package.json)
Step 3: Assess Migration Complexity
Count occurrences of these patterns that need changes:
→new Connection(...)createSolanaRpc(...)
→Keypair.fromSecretKey(...)createKeyPairSignerFromBytes(...)
→new PublicKey(...)address(...)
→new Transaction()createTransactionMessage(...)- Class-based patterns → Functional composition with
pipe()
Step 4: Recommend Strategy
Based on findings, recommend:
- Full Migration: If no blockers and < 50 migration points
- Gradual Migration: If 50-200 migration points, use
@solana/compat - Wait: If Anchor-dependent or critical SDKs don't support Kit
- Hybrid: If only specific modules need Kit performance
API Migration Reference
See
resources/api-mappings.md for complete mappings. Key conversions:
Connection → RPC
// v1 const connection = new Connection(url, 'confirmed'); const balance = await connection.getBalance(pubkey); // Kit const rpc = createSolanaRpc(url); const { value: balance } = await rpc.getBalance(address).send();
Keypair → KeyPairSigner
// v1 const keypair = Keypair.fromSecretKey(secretKey); console.log(keypair.publicKey.toBase58()); // Kit const signer = await createKeyPairSignerFromBytes(secretKey); console.log(signer.address);
Transaction Building
// v1 const tx = new Transaction().add( SystemProgram.transfer({ fromPubkey: sender.publicKey, toPubkey: recipient, lamports: amount, }) ); tx.recentBlockhash = blockhash; tx.feePayer = sender.publicKey; // Kit const tx = pipe( createTransactionMessage({ version: 0 }), tx => setTransactionMessageFeePayer(sender.address, tx), tx => setTransactionMessageLifetimeUsingBlockhash(blockhash, tx), tx => appendTransactionMessageInstruction( getTransferSolInstruction({ source: sender, destination: address(recipient), amount: lamports(BigInt(amount)), }), tx ), );
Edge Cases & Gotchas
1. BigInt Conversion
Kit uses native BigInt everywhere. Watch for:
// WRONG - will fail const amount = 1000000000; // CORRECT const amount = 1_000_000_000n; // or const amount = BigInt(1000000000); // or use helper const amount = lamports(1_000_000_000n);
2. Base58 Encoding Errors
Kit may require explicit encoding:
// If you see: "Encoded binary (base 58) data should be less than 128 bytes" // Add encoding parameter: await rpc.getAccountInfo(address, { encoding: 'base64' }).send();
3. Async Keypair Generation
Kit keypair creation is async (uses WebCrypto):
// v1 - synchronous const keypair = Keypair.generate(); // Kit - MUST await const keypair = await generateKeyPairSigner();
4. RPC Method Chaining
Kit RPC calls require
.send():
// v1 const balance = await connection.getBalance(pubkey); // Kit - don't forget .send()! const { value: balance } = await rpc.getBalance(address).send();
5. PublicKey vs Address
These are different types and not interchangeable:
// Use @solana/compat for conversion import { fromLegacyPublicKey, toLegacyPublicKey } from '@solana/compat'; const kitAddress = fromLegacyPublicKey(legacyPublicKey); const legacyPubkey = toLegacyPublicKey(kitAddress);
6. Transaction Signing
Signing flow is different:
// v1 transaction.sign(keypair); // or const signed = await connection.sendTransaction(tx, [keypair]); // Kit - use signer pattern const signedTx = await signTransactionMessageWithSigners(txMessage); const signature = await sendAndConfirmTransaction(signedTx);
7. Anchor Incompatibility
Anchor generates v1 types. If using Anchor:
// Keep @solana/web3.js for Anchor interactions import { Connection, PublicKey } from '@solana/web3.js'; import { Program } from '@coral-xyz/anchor'; // Use Kit for non-Anchor parts if needed // Bridge with @solana/compat
8. Subscription Handling
Kit uses AsyncIterators:
// v1 const subscriptionId = connection.onAccountChange(pubkey, callback); connection.removeAccountChangeListener(subscriptionId); // Kit - use AbortController const abortController = new AbortController(); const notifications = await rpcSubscriptions .accountNotifications(address) .subscribe({ abortSignal: abortController.signal }); for await (const notification of notifications) { // handle notification } // To unsubscribe: abortController.abort();
9. VersionedTransaction Migration
// v1 const versionedTx = new VersionedTransaction(messageV0); // Kit - transactions are versioned by default const tx = createTransactionMessage({ version: 0 });
10. Lookup Tables
Address Lookup Tables work differently:
// v1 const lookupTable = await connection.getAddressLookupTable(tableAddress); const messageV0 = new TransactionMessage({...}).compileToV0Message([lookupTable.value]); // Kit // Lookup tables are handled in transaction compilation // See resources/lookup-tables-example.md
Alternative: Consider Gill
If Kit feels too low-level, consider Gill:
- Built on Kit primitives
- Higher-level abstractions
- Simpler API for common tasks
- Full Kit compatibility
import { createSolanaClient, sendSol } from 'gill'; const client = createSolanaClient({ rpcUrl }); await sendSol(client, { from: signer, to: recipient, amount: lamports(1n) });
Guidelines
- Always check Anchor compatibility before recommending Kit migration
- Recommend
for gradual migrations@solana/compat - Bundle size benefits matter most for browser applications
- Performance benefits matter most for high-throughput backends
- Don't migrate stable, working code without clear benefits
- Test thoroughly - Kit has different error types and behaviors
Files in This Skill
solana-kit-migration/ ├── SKILL.md # This file ├── scripts/ │ ├── analyze-migration.sh # Codebase analysis script │ └── detect-patterns.js # Pattern detection utility ├── resources/ │ ├── api-mappings.md # Complete API reference │ ├── compatibility-matrix.md # SDK compatibility info │ └── package-comparison.md # Feature comparison ├── examples/ │ ├── v1-to-kit/ # Migration examples │ │ ├── basic-transfer.md │ │ ├── token-operations.md │ │ └── subscription-handling.md │ └── mixed-codebase/ # Hybrid approach examples │ └── anchor-with-kit.md └── docs/ └── edge-cases.md # Detailed edge cases
Notes
- Kit was released as @solana/web3.js@2.0.0 on December 16, 2024
- It was later renamed to @solana/kit to avoid confusion
- The 1.x line is in maintenance mode but still widely used
- Migration tooling is evolving - check for updates regularly