Math and Combinatorics Patterns

Mathematical and combinatorial problems appear frequently in competitive programming and algorithm design. They often hide behind constraints that look like brute-force problems but require algebraic shortcuts to meet time limits. This reference covers eight core pattern families with recognition signals, templates, and pitfalls.

Pattern Recognition Table

Trigger Signals	Technique	Typical Complexity
"answer modulo 10^9+7", large product/sum	Modular Arithmetic	O(1) per operation
"count primes up to N", "smallest factor"	Sieve of Eratosthenes	O(N log log N)
"greatest common divisor", "least common multiple"	GCD / LCM	O(log min(a,b))
"how many ways to choose", "combinations mod p"	Binomial Coefficients	O(N) precompute, O(1) query
"compute a^b mod m", "matrix recurrence"	Fast Exponentiation	O(log b)
"count arrangements", "distribute items into groups"	Counting Techniques	Varies
"count elements satisfying at least one", "derangements"	Inclusion-Exclusion	O(2^k) for k constraints
"two players, optimal play", "who wins"	Game Theory (Sprague-Grundy)	Varies by state space

---

Constraint-to-Technique Mapping

• N up to 10^7 and asks about primes: Sieve of Eratosthenes.
• N up to 10^6 and asks "how many ways": Precomputed factorials + modular inverse for nCr.
• "modulo 10^9+7" anywhere in the problem: Modular arithmetic throughout; use modular inverse for division.
• Two players, finite game, no randomness: Sprague-Grundy theorem or direct DP on game states.
• "count subsets satisfying property" with small constraint count (k <= 20): Inclusion-exclusion over 2^k subsets.
• Linear recurrence with large N (10^18): Matrix exponentiation to compute nth term in O(k^3 log N).
• "distribute N items into K groups": Stars and bars, possibly combined with inclusion-exclusion for bounded constraints.

Individual Patterns

Modular Arithmetic

Recognition Signals

• Problem says "answer modulo 10^9+7" or any large prime
• Intermediate values overflow 64-bit integers
• Division is required under a modular context
• Counting problem with astronomically large answers

Core Idea

All arithmetic operations (add, subtract, multiply) distribute over modulo. Division under a prime modulus uses modular inverse:

a / b mod p = a * b^(p-2) mod p

via Fermat's little theorem. Always reduce intermediate results to prevent overflow.

Python Template

MOD = 10**9 + 7

def mod_add(a: int, b: int) -> int:
    return (a + b) % MOD

def mod_mul(a: int, b: int) -> int:
    return (a * b) % MOD

def mod_pow(base: int, exp: int, mod: int = MOD) -> int:
    result = 1
    base %= mod
    while exp > 0:
        if exp & 1:
            result = result * base % mod
        exp >>= 1
        base = base * base % mod
    return result

def mod_inv(a: int, mod: int = MOD) -> int:
    """Modular inverse via Fermat's little theorem. Requires mod is prime."""
    return mod_pow(a, mod - 2, mod)

def mod_div(a: int, b: int) -> int:
    return mod_mul(a, mod_inv(b))

Key Edge Cases

• Subtraction can go negative: use

  (a - b + MOD) % MOD

• Zero divisor:

  mod_inv(0)

  is undefined; guard against it
• Non-prime modulus: Fermat's theorem does not apply; use extended GCD instead
• Chained multiplications: reduce after every multiply, not just at the end

Common Mistakes

• Forgetting to take mod after subtraction, producing negative values
• Using Fermat's inverse with a composite modulus
• Applying mod to intermediate index calculations where exact values are needed

Sieve of Eratosthenes

Recognition Signals

• "Find all primes up to N" with N up to 10^7
• "Smallest prime factor of every number"
• Need to factorize many numbers efficiently
• "Count of prime factors" across a range

Core Idea

The classic sieve marks composites by iterating through multiples of each prime. The smallest-prime-factor (SPF) variant stores the smallest divisor at each index, enabling O(log N) factorization of any number after an O(N log log N) precompute. For ranges beyond memory, use a segmented sieve.

Python Template

def sieve_primes(n: int) -> list[bool]:
    """Standard boolean sieve. is_prime[i] is True if i is prime."""
    is_prime = [True] * (n + 1)
    is_prime[0] = is_prime[1] = False
    for i in range(2, int(n**0.5) + 1):
        if is_prime[i]:
            for j in range(i * i, n + 1, i):
                is_prime[j] = False
    return is_prime

def smallest_prime_factor(n: int) -> list[int]:
    """SPF sieve for fast factorization."""
    spf = list(range(n + 1))
    for i in range(2, int(n**0.5) + 1):
        if spf[i] == i:  # i is prime
            for j in range(i * i, n + 1, i):
                if spf[j] == j:
                    spf[j] = i
    return spf

def factorize(x: int, spf: list[int]) -> list[int]:
    """Factorize x using precomputed SPF table."""
    factors: list[int] = []
    while x > 1:
        factors.append(spf[x])
        x //= spf[x]
    return factors

Key Edge Cases

• N = 0 or 1: no primes exist; handle boundary
• Memory limit: standard sieve needs O(N) space; switch to segmented sieve above ~10^8
• SPF of 1: not defined; skip or handle separately
• Even numbers: can optimize by treating 2 specially and only sieving odds

Common Mistakes

• Starting inner loop at

  2*i

  instead of

  i*i

  (correct but slower)
• Off-by-one on sieve size (allocate

  n+1

  slots)
• Forgetting that

  sieve[0]

  and

  sieve[1]

  are not prime

GCD / LCM

Recognition Signals

• Problem explicitly mentions GCD or LCM
• "Find the largest number that divides all elements"
• "Smallest number divisible by all elements"
• Equations involving linear combinations of two integers (Bezout's identity)

Core Idea

Euclidean algorithm computes GCD in O(log min(a,b)). LCM derives from GCD:

lcm(a,b) = a * b // gcd(a,b)

. Extended Euclidean finds coefficients x, y such that

a*x + b*y = gcd(a,b)

, which is essential for modular inverse when the modulus is not prime.

Python Template

from math import gcd
from functools import reduce

def lcm(a: int, b: int) -> int:
    return a * b // gcd(a, b)

def lcm_array(arr: list[int]) -> int:
    return reduce(lcm, arr)

def gcd_array(arr: list[int]) -> int:
    return reduce(gcd, arr)

def extended_gcd(a: int, b: int) -> tuple[int, int, int]:
    """Returns (g, x, y) such that a*x + b*y = g = gcd(a, b)."""
    if b == 0:
        return a, 1, 0
    g, x1, y1 = extended_gcd(b, a % b)
    return g, y1, x1 - (a // b) * y1

def mod_inv_ext(a: int, m: int) -> int:
    """Modular inverse via extended GCD. Works for any coprime a, m."""
    g, x, _ = extended_gcd(a % m, m)
    if g != 1:
        raise ValueError(f"Inverse does not exist: gcd({a}, {m}) = {g}")
    return x % m

Key Edge Cases

• gcd(0, x) = x

  and

  gcd(0, 0) = 0

  by convention
• LCM overflow: compute

  a // gcd(a,b) * b

  instead of

  a * b // gcd(a,b)

• Negative inputs: take absolute values before computing
• Extended GCD with

  b = 0

  : base case returns

  (a, 1, 0)

Common Mistakes

• LCM overflow from multiplying before dividing by GCD
• Assuming modular inverse exists when

  gcd(a, m) != 1

• Recursion depth for very large inputs (Python's default limit); use iterative version if needed

Binomial Coefficients

Recognition Signals

• "How many ways to choose k items from n"
• "nCr mod p" with large n
• Pascal's triangle or binomial theorem mentioned
• Lattice path counting (grid movement problems)

Core Idea

For small n (up to ~10^6), precompute factorials and inverse factorials modulo a prime, then answer nCr queries in O(1). Pascal's triangle DP works for smaller n without modular arithmetic. Lucas' theorem handles nCr mod p when n is very large but p is small.

Python Template

MOD = 10**9 + 7

def precompute_factorials(n: int) -> tuple[list[int], list[int]]:
    """Precompute factorial and inverse factorial arrays mod MOD."""
    fact = [1] * (n + 1)
    for i in range(1, n + 1):
        fact[i] = fact[i - 1] * i % MOD
    inv_fact = [1] * (n + 1)
    inv_fact[n] = pow(fact[n], MOD - 2, MOD)
    for i in range(n - 1, -1, -1):
        inv_fact[i] = inv_fact[i + 1] * (i + 1) % MOD
    return fact, inv_fact

def nCr(n: int, r: int, fact: list[int], inv_fact: list[int]) -> int:
    if r < 0 or r > n:
        return 0
    return fact[n] * inv_fact[r] % MOD * inv_fact[n - r] % MOD

def lucas(n: int, r: int, p: int) -> int:
    """nCr mod p for small prime p, using Lucas' theorem."""
    if r == 0:
        return 1
    return lucas(n // p, r // p, p) * nCr_small(n % p, r % p, p) % p

def nCr_small(n: int, r: int, p: int) -> int:
    """Direct nCr mod p for n < p."""
    if r < 0 or r > n:
        return 0
    num = den = 1
    for i in range(r):
        num = num * (n - i) % p
        den = den * (i + 1) % p
    return num * pow(den, p - 2, p) % p

Key Edge Cases

• nCr(n, 0) = 1

  and

  nCr(n, n) = 1

  for all valid n

• r > n

  returns 0
• Negative r or n: return 0
• Lucas' theorem only works when p is prime

Common Mistakes

• Off-by-one in precompute size (need

  n+1

  slots)
• Using Lucas' theorem with composite modulus
• Forgetting the

  r > n

  guard, causing index-out-of-bounds

Fast Exponentiation

Recognition Signals

• "Compute a^b mod m" with b up to 10^18
• Linear recurrence (Fibonacci-like) with very large n
• "Matrix power" or "transform applied k times"
• State transition repeated billions of times

Core Idea

Binary exponentiation computes

a^b mod m

in O(log b) by squaring the base and halving the exponent at each step. Matrix exponentiation extends this: represent a linear recurrence as a matrix multiplication, then raise the transition matrix to the nth power. This turns O(n) recurrence evaluation into O(k^3 log n) where k is the matrix dimension.

Python Template

def power(base: int, exp: int, mod: int) -> int:
    """Binary exponentiation: base^exp mod mod."""
    result = 1
    base %= mod
    while exp > 0:
        if exp & 1:
            result = result * base % mod
        exp >>= 1
        base = base * base % mod
    return result

Matrix = list[list[int]]

def mat_mul(a: Matrix, b: Matrix, mod: int) -> Matrix:
    """Multiply two square matrices mod mod."""
    n = len(a)
    result = [[0] * n for _ in range(n)]
    for i in range(n):
        for k in range(n):
            if a[i][k] == 0:
                continue
            for j in range(n):
                result[i][j] = (result[i][j] + a[i][k] * b[k][j]) % mod
    return result

def mat_pow(mat: Matrix, exp: int, mod: int) -> Matrix:
    """Raise a square matrix to exp-th power mod mod."""
    n = len(mat)
    result = [[int(i == j) for j in range(n)] for i in range(n)]
    while exp > 0:
        if exp & 1:
            result = mat_mul(result, mat, mod)
        exp >>= 1
        mat = mat_mul(mat, mat, mod)
    return result

Key Edge Cases

• exp = 0

  : result is 1 (scalar) or identity matrix

• base = 0

  with

  exp = 0

  : conventionally 1, but problem-dependent
• Overflow in matrix multiplication: reduce mod at every addition
• Recurrence with more than 2 terms: increase matrix dimension accordingly

Common Mistakes

• Forgetting to handle

  exp = 0

  as a special case
• Not reducing base modulo m before starting (causes unnecessary large intermediate values)
• Using the wrong matrix dimension for the recurrence

Counting Techniques

Recognition Signals

• "How many ways to arrange/distribute/partition"
• "Count sequences satisfying constraints"
• "Stars and bars" or "multiset coefficient"
• Catalan-number patterns: balanced parentheses, binary trees, non-crossing partitions

Core Idea

Permutations count ordered arrangements; combinations count unordered selections. Stars and bars counts ways to distribute n identical items into k distinct bins:

C(n+k-1, k-1)

. Catalan numbers count structures with recursive nesting (nth Catalan =

C(2n, n) / (n+1)

). Recognize which formula applies by identifying whether order matters and whether items are identical or distinct.

Python Template

MOD = 10**9 + 7

def permutations_mod(n: int, r: int, fact: list[int], inv_fact: list[int]) -> int:
    """P(n, r) = n! / (n-r)! mod MOD."""
    if r < 0 or r > n:
        return 0
    return fact[n] * inv_fact[n - r] % MOD

def stars_and_bars(n: int, k: int, fact: list[int], inv_fact: list[int]) -> int:
    """Distribute n identical items into k distinct bins (each >= 0)."""
    return nCr(n + k - 1, k - 1, fact, inv_fact)

def catalan(n: int, fact: list[int], inv_fact: list[int]) -> int:
    """Nth Catalan number mod MOD."""
    return nCr(2 * n, n, fact, inv_fact) * pow(n + 1, MOD - 2, MOD) % MOD

def multiset_coeff(n: int, k: int, fact: list[int], inv_fact: list[int]) -> int:
    """Choose k items from n types with repetition allowed. Uses nCr from above."""
    return nCr(n + k - 1, k, fact, inv_fact)

Key Edge Cases

• Stars and bars with lower bounds: shift variables (replace x_i with y_i = x_i - lower_i)
• Catalan(0) = 1 by convention
• Empty arrangements: 0 items chosen from n gives 1 way (the empty selection)
• Upper-bounded distributions: combine stars and bars with inclusion-exclusion

Common Mistakes

• Confusing "with repetition" vs "without repetition" in the problem statement
• Applying stars and bars when items are distinct (use multinomial instead)
• Forgetting the

  n+1

  denominator in the Catalan formula

Inclusion-Exclusion

Recognition Signals

• "Count elements satisfying at least one of k properties"
• "Count permutations with no fixed points" (derangements)
• "Count integers in range divisible by at least one of given primes"
• Constraints that are easier to count by complementing

Core Idea

Inclusion-exclusion alternates between adding and subtracting intersection sizes:

|A1 union A2 union ... Ak| = sum|Ai| - sum|Ai intersect Aj| + ...

. This is powerful when direct counting is hard but counting elements with specific properties (or their complements) is easy. Derangements are a classic application:

D(n) = n! * sum_{i=0}^{n} (-1)^i / i!

.

Python Template

MOD = 10**9 + 7

def inclusion_exclusion(sets_sizes: list[int], intersect_fn) -> int:
    """Generic IE over k sets. intersect_fn(mask) returns |intersection of sets in mask|."""
    k = len(sets_sizes)
    total = 0
    for mask in range(1, 1 << k):
        bits = bin(mask).count("1")
        size = intersect_fn(mask)
        if bits % 2 == 1:
            total = (total + size) % MOD
        else:
            total = (total - size + MOD) % MOD
    return total

def derangements(n: int) -> int:
    """Count permutations with no fixed points, mod MOD."""
    if n == 0:
        return 1
    if n == 1:
        return 0
    dp = [0] * (n + 1)
    dp[0] = 1
    dp[1] = 0
    for i in range(2, n + 1):
        dp[i] = (i - 1) * (dp[i - 1] + dp[i - 2]) % MOD
    return dp[n]

def euler_totient(n: int) -> int:
    """Euler's totient: count integers in [1, n] coprime to n."""
    result = n
    p = 2
    while p * p <= n:
        if n % p == 0:
            while n % p == 0:
                n //= p
            result -= result // p
        p += 1
    if n > 1:
        result -= result // n
    return result

Key Edge Cases

• D(0) = 1

  (the empty permutation is a derangement)
• Inclusion-exclusion with k > 20 is usually too slow (2^k subsets); look for algebraic shortcuts
• Totient of 1 is 1
• Overlapping constraints that are not independent require careful intersection counting

Common Mistakes

• Sign error: forgetting to alternate between addition and subtraction
• Double-counting when constraints are not mutually independent
• Not handling the complementary counting step (total minus IE result)

Game Theory (Sprague-Grundy)

Recognition Signals

• "Two players take turns, optimal play, who wins"
• Game with positions that can be decomposed into independent sub-games
• Nim-like games with pile manipulation
• "First player wins or second player wins"

Core Idea

The Sprague-Grundy theorem states that every impartial game position has a Grundy number (nimber). A position with Grundy number 0 is a losing position for the player to move. For composite games (independent sub-games), the overall Grundy number is the XOR of individual Grundy numbers. Standard Nim: XOR all pile sizes; if nonzero, first player wins.

Python Template

def compute_grundy(max_state: int, moves_fn) -> list[int]:
    """Compute Grundy numbers for states 0..max_state.

    moves_fn(state) returns an iterable of reachable states.
    """
    grundy = [0] * (max_state + 1)
    for state in range(max_state + 1):
        reachable: set[int] = set()
        for next_state in moves_fn(state):
            reachable.add(grundy[next_state])
        mex = 0
        while mex in reachable:
            mex += 1
        grundy[state] = mex
    return grundy

def game_winner(values: list[int]) -> str:
    """Winner via XOR. Works for Nim piles or composite Grundy values."""
    xor_sum = 0
    for v in values:
        xor_sum ^= v
    return "First" if xor_sum != 0 else "Second"

Key Edge Cases

• Terminal position (no moves available): Grundy number is 0 (losing for player to move)
• Single pile Nim: first player wins unless pile is 0
• Game with cycles: Sprague-Grundy applies only to acyclic (impartial) games
• Misere Nim: different endgame rule inverts the strategy for the last move

Common Mistakes

• Applying Sprague-Grundy to partisan games (different move sets per player)
• Forgetting that XOR-based composition requires sub-games to be independent
• Computing mex incorrectly by not collecting all reachable Grundy values first