Spartan-ai-toolkit competitive-teardown
Deep competitor analysis. Tear apart a specific competitor or compare multiple competitors. Use when the user names a competitor or asks "who else is doing this?"
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/c0x12c/ai-toolkit
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/c0x12c/ai-toolkit "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/.codex/skills/competitive-teardown" ~/.claude/skills/spartan-stratos-spartan-ai-toolkit-competitive-teardown && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
.codex/skills/competitive-teardown/SKILL.mdsource content
Competitive Teardown
Study competitors like you're planning to beat them.
When to Use
- User names a specific competitor
- "Who else is doing this?"
- Before building, to find gaps
- Preparing for investor "competition slide"
See
for a filled-in competitor teardown showing the format and depth expected.example-analysis.md
Single Competitor Teardown
Product
- What do they actually do? (use the product, not just the landing page)
- Key features
- What's good about it
- What sucks (check 1-star reviews on App Store, G2, Reddit)
- Pricing tiers
Business
- Funding (Crunchbase, PitchBook)
- Revenue if known (press, SimilarWeb traffic guesses)
- Team size (LinkedIn)
- Founded when
- Growth signals (hiring? launching new features? going quiet?)
Users
- Who uses it? (check case studies, reviews, social mentions)
- How do they get users? (SEO, ads, viral, sales team)
- Community size (Discord, Reddit, Twitter followers)
- NPS or satisfaction signals
Weaknesses
- Negative reviews (patterns, not one-offs)
- Missing features users ask for
- Pricing complaints
- Technical limitations
- Support complaints
Multi-Competitor Comparison
Create a table:
| Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C | Us (planned) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One-liner | ||||
| Target user | ||||
| Key feature | ||||
| Pricing | ||||
| Funding | ||||
| Weakness | ||||
| Our advantage |
Find the Gap
After analysis, answer:
- Where are ALL competitors weak?
- What do users want that nobody does well?
- Is there an underserved segment?
- What positioning would make us different?
Rules
- Use the product. Don't just read the landing page.
- Check reviews on multiple platforms
- Look for patterns in complaints, not single reviews
- Be fair. Give credit where it's due.
- If a competitor is way ahead, say so. Don't hide it.
Gotchas
- Don't just read the landing page. Sign up for free trials. Watch demo videos. Read user forums. The landing page is marketing, not the product.
- One-star reviews are gold, but look for patterns. A single angry review means nothing. Ten people saying the same thing is a signal.
- Funding ≠ success. A competitor with $50M raised and no revenue is weaker than one with $2M raised and growing 20% monthly.
- Don't confuse features with moat. A feature can be copied in a sprint. Distribution, data, and network effects can't.
- Check if they're growing or coasting. Recent job postings, new features, blog activity — these signal momentum. Silence signals trouble.
Output
Save to the project's
02-research/templates/competitor-analysis.md