Awesome-openclaw-skills research-paper-writer
Creates formal academic research papers following IEEE/ACM formatting standards with proper structure, citations, and scholarly writing style. Use when the user asks to write a research paper, academic paper, or conference paper on any topic.
git clone https://github.com/sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/research-paper-writer" ~/.claude/skills/sundial-org-awesome-openclaw-skills-research-paper-writer && rm -rf "$T"
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.openclaw/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/research-paper-writer" ~/.openclaw/skills/sundial-org-awesome-openclaw-skills-research-paper-writer && rm -rf "$T"
skills/research-paper-writer/SKILL.mdResearch Paper Writer
Overview
This skill guides the creation of formal academic research papers that meet publication standards for IEEE and ACM conferences/journals. It ensures proper structure, formatting, academic writing style, and comprehensive coverage of research topics.
Workflow
1. Understanding the Research Topic
When asked to write a research paper:
-
Clarify the topic and scope with the user:
- What is the main research question or contribution?
- What is the target audience (conference, journal, general academic)?
- What is the desired length (page count or word count)?
- Are there specific sections required?
- What formatting standard to use (IEEE or ACM)?
-
Gather context if needed:
- Review any provided research materials, data, or references
- Understand the domain and technical background
- Identify key related work or existing research to reference
2. Paper Structure
Follow this standard academic paper structure:
1. Title and Abstract - Concise title reflecting the main contribution - Abstract: 150-250 words summarizing purpose, methods, results, conclusions 2. Introduction - Motivation and problem statement - Research gap and significance - Main contributions (typically 3-5 bullet points) - Paper organization paragraph 3. Related Work / Background - Literature review of relevant research - Comparison with existing approaches - Positioning of current work 4. Methodology / Approach / System Design - Detailed description of proposed method/system - Architecture diagrams if applicable - Algorithms or procedures - Design decisions and rationale 5. Implementation (if applicable) - Technical details - Tools and technologies used - Challenges and solutions 6. Evaluation / Experiments / Results - Experimental setup - Datasets or test scenarios - Performance metrics - Results presentation (tables, graphs) - Analysis and interpretation 7. Discussion - Implications of results - Limitations and threats to validity - Lessons learned 8. Conclusion and Future Work - Summary of contributions - Impact and significance - Future research directions 9. References - Comprehensive bibliography in proper citation format
3. Academic Writing Style
Apply these writing conventions from scholarly research:
Tone and Voice:
- Formal, objective, and precise language
- Third-person perspective (avoid "I" or "we" unless describing specific contributions)
- Present tense for established facts, past tense for specific studies
- Clear, direct statements without unnecessary complexity
Technical Precision:
- Define all acronyms on first use: "Context-Aware Systems (C-AS)"
- Use domain-specific terminology correctly and consistently
- Quantify claims with specific metrics or evidence
- Avoid vague terms like "very", "many", "significant" without data
Argumentation:
- State claims clearly, then support with evidence
- Use logical progression: motivation → problem → solution → validation
- Compare and contrast with related work explicitly
- Address limitations and counterarguments
Section-Specific Guidelines:
Abstract:
- First sentence: broad context and motivation
- Second/third: specific problem and gap
- Middle: approach and methodology
- End: key results and contributions
- Self-contained (readable without the full paper)
Introduction:
- Start with real-world motivation or compelling problem
- Build from general to specific (inverted pyramid)
- End with clear contribution list and paper roadmap
- Use examples to illustrate the problem
Related Work:
- Group related work by theme or approach
- Compare explicitly: "Unlike [X] which focuses on Y, our approach..."
- Identify gaps: "However, these approaches do not address..."
- Position your work clearly
Results:
- Present data clearly in tables/figures
- Describe trends and patterns objectively
- Compare with baselines quantitatively
- Acknowledge unexpected or negative results
4. Formatting Guidelines
IEEE Format (default):
- Page size: A4 (210mm × 297mm)
- Margins: Top 19mm, Bottom 43mm, Left/Right 14.32mm
- Two-column layout with 4.22mm column separation
- Font: Times New Roman throughout
- Title: 24pt bold
- Author names: 11pt
- Section headings: 10pt bold, numbered (1., 1.1, 1.1.1)
- Body text: 10pt
- Figure/Table captions: 8pt
- Line spacing: Single
- Paragraph: No indentation, 3pt spacing between paragraphs
- Figures: Centered, with captions below
- Tables: Centered, with captions above
ACM Format (alternative):
- Standard ACM conference proceedings format
- Single-column abstract, two-column body
- Include CCS Concepts and Keywords sections after abstract
- Use ACM reference format for citations
5. Citations and References
In-text citations:
- Use numbered citations: "Recent work [1, 2] has shown..."
- Multiple citations in chronological order: [3, 7, 12]
- Reference specific sections: "As demonstrated in [5, Section 3]..."
Reference formatting (IEEE style):
[1] A. Author, B. Author, and C. Author, "Title of paper," in Proc. Conference Name, Year, pp. 123-456. [2] D. Author, "Title of journal article," Journal Name, vol. X, no. Y, pp. 123-456, Month Year. [3] E. Author, Book Title, Edition. City: Publisher, Year.
Reference list requirements:
- Alphabetically ordered by first author's last name (or numbered by citation order)
- Include DOI or URL when available
- Minimum 15-20 references for a full paper
- Mix of recent (last 5 years) and foundational works
6. Content Generation Process
Step-by-step approach:
-
Create outline
- Develop detailed section-by-section outline
- Define key points for each section
- Identify where figures/tables are needed
-
Draft sections iteratively
- Start with methodology (core contribution)
- Then introduction (now that contribution is clear)
- Related work (to position the contribution)
- Results and evaluation
- Discussion and conclusion
- Abstract last (summary of complete paper)
-
Add citations
- Reference related work throughout
- Support claims with evidence from literature
- Create comprehensive reference list
-
Review and refine
- Check logical flow between sections
- Ensure consistency in terminology
- Verify all figures/tables are referenced in text
- Confirm abstract matches content
- Validate citation completeness
Examples
Example 1: User asks for a survey paper
User: "Write a research paper surveying recent advances in context-aware systems" Response: 1. Clarify scope: "I'll create a survey paper on context-aware systems. A few questions: - Should I focus on specific aspects (e.g., requirements engineering, implementation techniques)? - What time period for 'recent' (last 5 years, 10 years)? - Target length: 10-15 pages, or 20-30 pages comprehensive survey? - IEEE or ACM format?" 2. After clarification, create outline showing: - Taxonomy of context-aware systems - Survey methodology - Classification scheme - Section-by-section coverage of different aspects - Trends and future directions 3. Draft paper following survey structure with extensive related work coverage
Example 2: User asks for an experimental paper
User: "Write a paper about my new algorithm for detecting hallucinations in vision-language models" Response: 1. Gather details about: - Algorithm approach and novelty - Experimental setup and datasets used - Results and metrics - Comparison baselines 2. Structure as experimental paper: - Introduction: motivation for hallucination detection - Related work: existing detection methods - Proposed method: detailed algorithm description - Experiments: datasets, metrics, setup - Results: quantitative comparison with baselines - Analysis: ablation studies, error analysis - Conclusion: contributions and future work 3. Emphasize reproducibility and empirical validation
Resources
references/
: Detailed academic writing conventions extracted from example paperswriting_style_guide.md
: Complete IEEE formatting specificationsieee_formatting_specs.md
: Complete ACM formatting specificationsacm_formatting_specs.md
assets/
: IEEE paper template with formatting examplesfull_paper_template.pdf
: ACM paper templateinterim-layout.pdf- Reference these templates when discussing formatting requirements with users
Important Notes
- Always ask for clarification on topic scope before starting
- Quality over speed: Take time to structure properly and write clearly
- Cite appropriately: Academic integrity requires proper attribution
- Be honest about limitations: Acknowledge gaps or constraints in the research
- Maintain consistency: Terminology, notation, and style throughout
- User provides the research content: This skill structures and writes; the user provides the technical contributions and findings