Tambo creating-styled-wrappers
Creates styled wrapper components that compose headless/base compound components. Use when refactoring styled components to use base primitives, implementing opinionated design systems on top of headless components, or when the user mentions "use base components", "compose primitives", "styled wrapper", or "refactor to use base".
git clone https://github.com/tambo-ai/tambo
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/tambo-ai/tambo "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/.claude/skills/creating-styled-wrappers" ~/.claude/skills/tambo-ai-tambo-creating-styled-wrappers && rm -rf "$T"
.claude/skills/creating-styled-wrappers/SKILL.mdStyling Compound Wrappers
Create styled wrapper components that compose headless base compound components. This skill complements
building-compound-components (which builds the base primitives) by focusing on how to properly consume and wrap them with styling and additional behavior.
Real-world example: See references/real-world-example.md for a complete before/after MessageInput refactoring.
Core Principle: Compose, Don't Duplicate
Styled wrappers should compose base components, not re-implement their logic.
// WRONG - re-implementing what base already does const StyledInput = ({ children, className }) => { const { value, setValue, submit } = useTamboThreadInput(); // Duplicated! const [isDragging, setIsDragging] = useState(false); // Duplicated! const handleDrop = useCallback(/* ... */); // Duplicated! return ( <form onDrop={handleDrop} className={className}> {children} </form> ); }; // CORRECT - compose the base component const StyledInput = ({ children, className, variant }) => { return ( <BaseInput.Root className={cn(inputVariants({ variant }), className)}> <BaseInput.Content className="rounded-xl data-[dragging]:border-dashed"> {children} </BaseInput.Content> </BaseInput.Root> ); };
Refactoring Workflow
Copy this checklist and track progress:
Styled Wrapper Refactoring: - [ ] Step 1: Identify duplicated logic - [ ] Step 2: Import base components - [ ] Step 3: Wrap with Base Root - [ ] Step 4: Apply state-based styling and behavior - [ ] Step 5: Wrap sub-components with styling - [ ] Step 6: Final verification
Step 1: Identify Duplicated Logic
Look for patterns that indicate logic should come from base:
- SDK hooks (
,useTamboThread
, etc.)useTamboThreadInput - Context creation (
)React.createContext - State management that mirrors base component state
- Event handlers (drag, submit, etc.) that base components handle
Step 2: Import Base Components
import { MessageInput as MessageInputBase } from "@tambo-ai/react-ui-base/message-input";
Step 3: Wrap with Base Root
Replace custom context/state management with the base Root:
// Before const MessageInput = ({ children, variant }) => { return ( <MessageInputInternal variant={variant}>{children}</MessageInputInternal> ); }; // After const MessageInput = ({ children, variant, className }) => { return ( <MessageInputBase.Root className={cn(variants({ variant }), className)}> {children} </MessageInputBase.Root> ); };
Step 4: Apply State-Based Styling and Behavior
State access follows a hierarchy — use the simplest option that works:
- Data attributes (preferred for styling) — base components expose
attributesdata-* - Render props (for behavior changes) — use when rendering different components
- Context hooks (for sub-components) — OK for styled sub-components needing deep context access
// BEST - data-* classes for styling, render props only for behavior // Note: use `data-[dragging]:*` syntax (v3-compatible), not `data-dragging:*` (v4 only) const StyledContent = ({ children }) => ( <BaseComponent.Content className={cn( "group rounded-xl border", "data-[dragging]:border-dashed data-[dragging]:border-emerald-400", )} > {({ elicitation, resolveElicitation }) => ( <> {/* Drop overlay uses group-data-* for styling */} <div className="hidden group-data-[dragging]:flex absolute inset-0 bg-emerald-50/90"> <p>Drop files here</p> </div> {elicitation ? ( <ElicitationUI request={elicitation} onResponse={resolveElicitation} /> ) : ( children )} </> )} </BaseComponent.Content> ); // OK - styled sub-components can use context hook for deep access const StyledTextarea = ({ placeholder }) => { const { value, setValue, handleSubmit, editorRef } = useMessageInputContext(); return ( <CustomEditor ref={editorRef} value={value} onChange={setValue} onSubmit={handleSubmit} placeholder={placeholder} /> ); };
When to use context hooks vs render props:
- Render props: when the parent wrapper needs state for behavior changes
- Context hooks: when a styled sub-component needs values not exposed via render props
Step 5: Wrap Sub-Components
// Submit button const SubmitButton = ({ className, children }) => ( <BaseComponent.SubmitButton className={cn("w-10 h-10 rounded-lg", className)}> {({ showCancelButton }) => children ?? (showCancelButton ? <Square /> : <ArrowUp />) } </BaseComponent.SubmitButton> ); // Error const Error = ({ className }) => ( <BaseComponent.Error className={cn("text-sm text-destructive", className)} /> ); // Staged images - base pre-computes props array, just iterate const StagedImages = ({ className }) => ( <BaseComponent.StagedImages className={cn("flex gap-2", className)}> {({ images }) => images.map((imageProps) => ( <ImageBadge key={imageProps.image.id} {...imageProps} /> )) } </BaseComponent.StagedImages> );
Step 6: Final Verification
Final Checks: - [ ] No duplicate context creation - [ ] No duplicate SDK hooks in root wrappers - [ ] No duplicate state management or event handlers - [ ] Base namespace imported and `Base.Root` used as wrapper - [ ] `data-*` classes used for styling (with `group-data-*` for children) - [ ] Render props used only for rendering behavior changes - [ ] Base sub-components wrapped with styling - [ ] Icon factories passed from styled layer to base hooks - [ ] Visual sub-components and CSS variants stay in styled layer
What Belongs in Styled Layer
Icon Factories
When base hooks need icons, pass a factory function:
// Base hook accepts optional icon factory export function useCombinedResourceList( providers: ResourceProvider[] | undefined, search: string, createMcpIcon?: (serverName: string) => React.ReactNode, ) { /* ... */ } // Styled layer provides the factory const resources = useCombinedResourceList(providers, search, (serverName) => ( <McpServerIcon name={serverName} className="w-4 h-4" /> ));
CSS Variants
const inputVariants = cva("w-full", { variants: { variant: { default: "", solid: "[&>div]:shadow-xl [&>div]:ring-1", bordered: "[&>div]:border-2", }, }, });
Layout Logic, Visual Sub-Components, Custom Data Fetching
These all stay in the styled layer. Base handles behavior; styled handles presentation.
Type Handling
Handle ref type differences between base and styled components:
// Base context may have RefObject<T | null> // Styled component may need RefObject<T> <TextEditor ref={editorRef as React.RefObject<TamboEditor>} />
Anti-Patterns
- Re-implementing base logic - if base handles it, compose it
- Using render props for styling - prefer
classes; render props are for behavior changesdata-* - Duplicating context in wrapper - use base Root which provides context
- Hardcoding icons in base hooks - use factory functions to keep styling in styled layer