Local-life-manager quality
Comprehensive code quality assessment in spaces/[project]/. Use before commits, merges, or releases to ensure consistent quality.
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/TaylorHuston/local-life-manager
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/TaylorHuston/local-life-manager "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/.claude/skills/quality" ~/.claude/skills/taylorhuston-local-life-manager-quality && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
.claude/skills/quality/SKILL.mdsource content
/quality
Comprehensive quality assessment of code using multi-agent analysis.
Usage
/quality yourbench # Full assessment /quality yourbench --focus security # Security-focused /quality coordinatr --focus testing # Test coverage focus
Focus Areas
| Flag | Analysis | Agent |
|---|---|---|
| (none) | All dimensions | All specialists |
| OWASP, vulnerabilities | security-auditor |
| Bottlenecks, N+1 | performance-optimizer |
| Coverage, test quality | test-engineer |
| Maintainability | code-reviewer |
Execution Flow
1. Locate Project
ls spaces/[project]/
2. Run Automated Checks
cd spaces/[project] npm test -- --coverage npm run lint npm run type-check # if TypeScript
3. Agent Analysis
Coordinate specialists via Task tool:
- code-reviewer: Complexity, best practices
- security-auditor: OWASP Top 10
- performance-optimizer: N+1 queries, bottlenecks
- test-engineer: Coverage, test quality
4. Generate Report
## Quality Assessment: [project] **Overall Score: XX/100** [status] ### Code Quality: XX/100 - Issues found - Recommendations ### Security: XX/100 - Critical/High/Medium issues - Recommendations ### Performance: XX/100 - Bottlenecks identified - Recommendations ### Testing: XX/100 - Coverage percentage - Untested areas ### Priority Actions 1. **CRITICAL**: [action] 2. **HIGH**: [action] 3. **MEDIUM**: [action]
Scoring
| Score | Status | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | Excellent | Ship it |
| 80-89 | Good | Minor improvements |
| 70-79 | Acceptable | Address soon |
| 60-69 | Concerning | Fix before merge |
| <60 | Critical | Must fix |
Quality Dimensions
Code Quality
- Cyclomatic complexity
- Code duplication
- SOLID principles
- Dead code detection
Security
- OWASP Top 10
- Auth/authz patterns
- Input validation
- Secrets in code
Performance
- N+1 query detection
- Inefficient algorithms
- Bundle size
- Caching opportunities
Testing
- Line/branch coverage
- Test quality
- Edge case coverage
- Integration test gaps
When to Use
- Before major release
- Onboarding to new codebase
- Periodic health checks
- Before refactoring