Ai-first-toolkit analyze-performance
Analyze engagement patterns across published posts to identify what works. Use when asked to review performance, find successful patterns, or optimize future content.
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/plugins/content-studio/skills/analyze-performance" ~/.claude/skills/techwolf-ai-ai-first-toolkit-analyze-performance && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
plugins/content-studio/skills/analyze-performance/SKILL.mdsource content
Analyze Content Performance
Identify patterns in high-performing posts to inform future content strategy.
Process
- Run
to read all published LinkedIn posts./scripts/print-published.sh linkedin-post - Extract posts that have engagement data (engagement.reactions, engagement.views, etc.)
- Analyze patterns across high-performing vs low-performing posts
Analysis Dimensions
Hook Analysis
- What hook styles correlate with higher engagement?
- Personal anecdote vs company experience vs surprising data vs news hook?
- First 210 characters (LinkedIn cutoff) - what patterns work?
Content Characteristics
- Word count vs engagement correlation
- Use of concrete examples vs abstract concepts
- Presence of frameworks or mental models
- Use of lists/structure vs flowing narrative
Topic Analysis
- Which tags correlate with higher engagement?
- Which themes resonate most?
- Timing patterns (if publishedDate available)
Structural Patterns
- Opening style (question, statement, story)
- Closing style (call-to-action, reflection, question)
- Paragraph length and density
Performance Tiers
Categorize posts by reaction count:
- High performers: 100+ reactions
- Medium performers: 30-99 reactions
- Lower performers: <30 reactions
Output Format
Provide:
- Summary statistics - Total posts analyzed, average engagement by tier
- Top performers - List highest-engagement posts with their key characteristics
- Pattern insights - What distinguishes high vs lower performers?
- Recommendations - Actionable suggestions for future content
Example Analysis Output
## Performance Summary - Posts analyzed: 12 (with engagement data) - High performers (100+): 3 posts - Medium performers (30-99): 5 posts - Lower performers (<30): 4 posts ## Top Performers 1. "Title" - 245 reactions - Hook: Personal anecdote - Topic: AI productivity - Word count: 180 ## Key Patterns - Personal anecdotes in the first sentence correlate with 2x higher engagement - Posts with concrete examples outperform abstract posts by 40% - Optimal word count appears to be 150-200 words ## Recommendations 1. Lead with personal or company-specific openings 2. Include at least one specific example or data point 3. Keep total length under 220 words
Notes
- Only analyze posts with engagement data (skip posts without metrics)
- Correlation is not causation - note patterns but don't overclaim
- Consider recency bias - newer posts may still be accumulating engagement