Turbo reply-to-pr-threads
Draft, confirm, and post replies to GitHub PR review threads. Handles per-category reply formatting, re-fetches thread resolution state so auto-resolved threads are skipped, and posts via GraphQL. Use when the user asks to \"reply to PR threads\", \"post PR thread replies\", or \"draft PR reply messages\".
git clone https://github.com/tobihagemann/turbo
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/tobihagemann/turbo "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/reply-to-pr-threads" ~/.claude/skills/tobihagemann-turbo-reply-to-pr-threads && rm -rf "$T"
skills/reply-to-pr-threads/SKILL.mdReply to PR Threads
Draft replies for a processed review-thread list, confirm with the user, and post the surviving drafts.
Step 1: Run /github-voice
Skill
/github-voiceRun the
/github-voice skill to load voice rules and the insider-vs-outsider detection.
Step 2: Re-fetch Thread State
Auto-detect owner, repo, and PR number from the current branch if not provided, then query the current resolution state:
gh api graphql -f query=' query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $pr: Int!) { repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) { pullRequest(number: $pr) { reviewThreads(first: 100) { nodes { id isResolved } } } } }' -f owner='{owner}' -f repo='{repo}' -F pr={pr_number}
Drop threads whose
isResolved is now true. Reviewers or bots such as CodeRabbit may resolve threads after the original fetch, and drafting replies for them is wasted work.
Step 3: Draft Replies
Use the processed-thread list from conversation context. Each entry has: thread id, file path, line, category (
fix, skip, answer, or clarify), and per-category payload.
Keep every reply to one or two sentences. No bullet-point reasoning. No bolded labels.
fix: payload is a commit SHA, optionally with a divergence note.
Fixed in <commit-sha>.
Only add a brief sentence after the SHA when the fix meaningfully diverges from what the reviewer suggested. Otherwise the SHA alone is enough.
skip: payload is the skip reasoning. State the reasoning directly. Do not apologize or hedge.
answer: payload is raw answer text from
/answer-reviewer-questions. Tighten to one or two sentences and apply /github-voice rules (no em dashes, natural tone). Do not cite transcripts or mention Claude. The reply reads as the implementer's own explanation.
clarify: payload is a user-directed question. Draft it as directed.
Step 4: Present Drafts and Confirm
Output all drafts as text, grouped by file:
### <file-path> **Thread <id>** (<category>, line <line>) Reviewer: <original comment, truncated if long> Reply: <drafted reply>
Then use
AskUserQuestion to ask whether to post. Offer:
- Post — post all drafts as shown
- Cancel — skip posting
Step 5: Post Replies
For each approved draft, post via the reply mutation:
gh api graphql -f query=' mutation($threadId: ID!, $body: String!) { addPullRequestReviewThreadReply(input: {pullRequestReviewThreadId: $threadId, body: $body}) { comment { id } } }' -f threadId="THREAD_ID" -f body="REPLY_BODY"
Substitute
THREAD_ID with the thread's id and REPLY_BODY with the drafted reply text for each post. Report what was posted and what was skipped (due to auto-resolution between re-fetch and posting).
Then use the TaskList tool and proceed to any remaining task.
Rules
- Never resolve or dismiss a review thread. Only reply. Let the reviewer resolve.
- If a post mutation fails because the thread is already resolved, log the skip and continue with the rest.