Vibecosystem refactor
Code refactoring workflow - analyze → plan → implement → review → validate
install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/vibeeval/vibecosystem
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/vibeeval/vibecosystem "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/refactor" ~/.claude/skills/vibeeval-vibecosystem-refactor && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
skills/refactor/SKILL.mdsource content
/refactor - Refactoring Workflow
Safe refactoring with review gates.
When to Use
- "Refactor X"
- "Clean up this code"
- "Extract this into a module"
- "Improve the architecture of Y"
- Large-scale code restructuring
- Technical debt reduction
Workflow Overview
┌──────────┐ ┌────────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ phoenix │───▶│ plan- │───▶│ kraken │───▶│plan-reviewer│───▶│ arbiter │ │ │ │ agent │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └──────────┘ └────────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └───────────┘ Analyze Plan Implement Review Verify current changes refactor changes tests pass
Agent Sequence
| # | Agent | Role | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | phoenix | Analyze current code, identify improvement areas | Analysis report |
| 2 | plan-agent | Create safe refactoring plan | Step-by-step plan |
| 3 | kraken | Implement the refactoring | Code changes |
| 4 | plan-reviewer | Review changes for correctness | Review report |
| 5 | arbiter | Verify all tests still pass | Test report |
Refactoring Principles
- Tests first: Ensure adequate test coverage before refactoring
- Small steps: Each change should be independently verifiable
- Behavior preserved: No functional changes during refactor
- Reviewable: Changes should be easy to review
Execution
Phase 1: Analyze
Task( subagent_type="phoenix", prompt=""" Analyze for refactoring: [TARGET_CODE] Identify: - Current pain points - Code smells - Improvement opportunities - Risk areas - Test coverage gaps """ )
Phase 2: Plan
Task( subagent_type="plan-agent", prompt=""" Plan refactoring: [TARGET_CODE] Analysis: [from phoenix] Create: - Step-by-step refactoring plan - Each step should be: - Small and focused - Independently testable - Reversible - Identify files affected - Risk mitigation strategy """ )
Phase 3: Implement
Task( subagent_type="kraken", prompt=""" Implement refactoring: [TARGET_CODE] Plan: [from plan-agent] Requirements: - Follow plan exactly - Run tests after each step - Stop if tests fail - NO behavior changes """ )
Phase 4: Review
Task( subagent_type="plan-reviewer", prompt=""" Review refactoring: [TARGET_CODE] Changes: [git diff from kraken] Check: - Behavior preserved - No unintended changes - Code quality improved - Patterns consistent """ )
Phase 5: Validate
Task( subagent_type="arbiter", prompt=""" Validate refactoring: [TARGET_CODE] - Run full test suite - Verify no regressions - Check type errors - Run linting """ )
Refactoring Types
Extract Module
phoenix → plan-agent → kraken → plan-reviewer → arbiter
Rename/Restructure
phoenix → kraken → arbiter (simpler, skip detailed planning)
Architecture Change
phoenix → plan-agent → [kraken → plan-reviewer] × N phases → arbiter
Example
User: /refactor Extract the validation logic into a separate module Claude: Starting /refactor workflow... Phase 1: Analyzing current structure... [Spawns phoenix] Found: Validation logic spread across 4 files - form.ts (lines 45-120) - api.ts (lines 200-280) - user.ts (lines 15-45) - order.ts (lines 88-130) Phase 2: Planning extraction... [Spawns plan-agent] Plan: 1. Create src/validation/index.ts 2. Extract common validators 3. Update imports one file at a time 4. Run tests after each change Phase 3: Implementing... [Spawns kraken] Completed all 4 steps, tests green after each Phase 4: Reviewing changes... [Spawns plan-reviewer] ✅ All behavior preserved ✅ DRY improved (removed 45 duplicate lines) ✅ New structure consistent Phase 5: Final validation... [Spawns arbiter] ✅ 312 tests passing, 0 regressions Refactoring complete!
Safety Flags
: Plan but don't implement--dry-run
: Pause after each change for approval--step-by-step
: Require >80% coverage before proceeding--coverage-check