Vibecosystem tech-radar-patterns

ThoughtWorks Radar model, technology evaluation framework, ADR format, and stack compatibility analysis

install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/vibeeval/vibecosystem
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/vibeeval/vibecosystem "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/tech-radar-patterns" ~/.claude/skills/vibeeval-vibecosystem-tech-radar-patterns && rm -rf "$T"
manifest: skills/tech-radar-patterns/SKILL.md
source content

Tech Radar Patterns

Radar Model (ThoughtWorks)

RingTanımAksiyon
AdoptProduction-ready, önerilenYeni projelerde varsayılan
TrialDeğer kanıtlanmış, pilotPilot projede dene
Assessİlginç, araştırPoC yap, değerlendir
HoldYeni projelerde KULLANMAMevcut kullanımı migre et

4 Quadrant

Quadrantİçerik
TechniquesPractices, patterns, methodologies
PlatformsInfrastructure, cloud services
ToolsDevelopment tools, frameworks
Languages & FrameworksProgramming languages, UI frameworks

Technology Evaluation Framework (8 Dimension)

## Değerlendirme: [Technology Name]

| Dimension | Score (1-5) | Not |
|-----------|-------------|-----|
| Maturity | | Community, stability, releases |
| Community | | GitHub stars, SO activity, ecosystem |
| Performance | | Benchmarks, latency, throughput |
| Developer Experience | | Learning curve, docs, tooling |
| Security | | CVE history, audit, compliance |
| Scalability | | Horizontal/vertical scaling |
| Integration | | Mevcut stack ile uyum |
| Cost | | License, hosting, maintenance |

**Total Score:** /40
**Ring Recommendation:** Adopt/Trial/Assess/Hold

Architecture Decision Record (ADR)

# ADR-001: [Karar Başlığı]

## Status
Accepted | Proposed | Deprecated | Superseded by ADR-XXX

## Context
[Karar verilmesi gereken durum, kısıtlar, driver'lar]

## Decision
[Alınan karar ve gerekçesi]

## Consequences
### Positive
- [Fayda 1]
- [Fayda 2]

### Negative
- [Tradeoff 1]
- [Risk 1]

### Neutral
- [Etki 1]

Stack Compatibility Check

| Yeni Tech | Mevcut Stack | Uyumluluk | Risk |
|-----------|-------------|-----------|------|
| [Tech] | Node.js | Uyumlu | Düşük |
| [Tech] | PostgreSQL | Adapter var | Orta |
| [Tech] | Docker | Native support | Düşük |
| [Tech] | CI/CD | Plugin lazım | Orta |

Migration Prioritization

KriterAğırlıkScore Yöntemi
Business impact30%Revenue/user affected
Technical debt25%Maintenance burden
Security risk25%CVE severity
Migration effort20%Engineering weeks

Checklist

  • Her büyük tech kararı ADR ile documented
  • Radar quarterly güncelleniyor
  • Hold ring'deki tech'ler migration planında
  • Yeni tech 8-dimension evaluation'dan geçmiş
  • Stack compatibility check yapılmış
  • PoC results documented
  • License uygunluk kontrolü

Anti-Patterns

  • Resume-driven development (CV için tech seçimi)
  • Shiny object syndrome (her yeni framework'u deneme)
  • Evaluation'sız tech adoption
  • ADR yazmadan büyük karar
  • Hold'daki tech'i yeni projede kullanma