git clone https://github.com/vibeforge1111/vibeship-spawner-skills
ai-agents/crewai/skill.yamlCrewAI Skill
Role-based multi-agent orchestration framework
id: crewai name: CrewAI version: 1.0.0 layer: 2 # Integration layer
description: | Expert in CrewAI - the leading role-based multi-agent framework used by 60% of Fortune 500 companies. Covers agent design with roles and goals, task definition, crew orchestration, process types (sequential, hierarchical, parallel), memory systems, and flows for complex workflows. Essential for building collaborative AI agent teams.
owns:
- Agent definitions (role, goal, backstory)
- Task design and dependencies
- Crew orchestration
- Process types (sequential, hierarchical)
- Memory configuration
- Tool integration
- Flows for complex workflows
pairs_with:
- langgraph
- autonomous-agents
- langfuse
- structured-output
requires:
- Python 3.10+
- crewai package
- LLM API access
ecosystem: primary: - CrewAI framework - CrewAI Tools common_integrations: - OpenAI / Anthropic / Ollama - SerperDev (search) - FileReadTool, DirectoryReadTool - Custom tools platforms: - Python applications - FastAPI backends - Enterprise deployments
prerequisites:
- Python proficiency
- Multi-agent concepts
- Understanding of delegation
limits:
- Python-only
- Best for structured workflows
- Can be verbose for simple cases
- Flows are newer feature
tags:
- crewai
- multi-agent
- agents
- orchestration
- roles
- collaborative-ai
triggers:
- "crewai"
- "multi-agent team"
- "agent roles"
- "crew of agents"
- "role-based agents"
- "collaborative agents"
history:
- version: "1.0.0" date: "2025-01" changes: "Initial skill covering CrewAI patterns"
contrarian_insights:
- claim: "More agents means better results" counter: "Focused agents with clear roles outperform large unfocused crews" evidence: "3-5 well-defined agents beat 10+ generic agents consistently"
- claim: "Let agents figure out their own approach" counter: "Planning before execution produces more consistent results" evidence: "CrewAI's planning feature shows 40% improvement in output quality"
- claim: "CrewAI is just for demos" counter: "With Flows, CrewAI handles enterprise-grade workflows" evidence: "60% of Fortune 500 companies using CrewAI in production"
identity: role: CrewAI Multi-Agent Architect personality: | You are an expert in designing collaborative AI agent teams with CrewAI. You think in terms of roles, responsibilities, and delegation. You design clear agent personas with specific expertise, create well-defined tasks with expected outputs, and orchestrate crews for optimal collaboration. You know when to use sequential vs hierarchical processes. expertise: - Agent persona design - Task decomposition - Crew orchestration - Process selection - Memory configuration - Flow design
patterns:
-
name: Basic Crew with YAML Config description: Define agents and tasks in YAML (recommended) when_to_use: Any CrewAI project implementation: |
config/agents.yaml
researcher: role: "Senior Research Analyst" goal: "Find comprehensive, accurate information on {topic}" backstory: | You are an expert researcher with years of experience in gathering and analyzing information. You're known for your thorough and accurate research. tools: - SerperDevTool - WebsiteSearchTool verbose: true
writer: role: "Content Writer" goal: "Create engaging, well-structured content" backstory: | You are a skilled writer who transforms research into compelling narratives. You focus on clarity and engagement. verbose: true
config/tasks.yaml
research_task: description: | Research the topic: {topic}
Focus on: 1. Key facts and statistics 2. Recent developments 3. Expert opinions 4. Contrarian viewpoints Be thorough and cite sources. agent: researcher expected_output: | A comprehensive research report with: - Executive summary - Key findings (bulleted) - Sources citedwriting_task: description: | Using the research provided, write an article about {topic}.
Requirements: - 800-1000 words - Engaging introduction - Clear structure with headers - Actionable conclusion agent: writer expected_output: "A polished article ready for publication" context: - research_task # Uses output from researchcrew.py
from crewai import Agent, Task, Crew, Process from crewai.project import CrewBase, agent, task, crew
@CrewBase class ContentCrew: agents_config = 'config/agents.yaml' tasks_config = 'config/tasks.yaml'
@agent def researcher(self) -> Agent: return Agent(config=self.agents_config['researcher']) @agent def writer(self) -> Agent: return Agent(config=self.agents_config['writer']) @task def research_task(self) -> Task: return Task(config=self.tasks_config['research_task']) @task def writing_task(self) -> Task: return Task(config=self.tasks_config['writing_task']) @crew def crew(self) -> Crew: return Crew( agents=self.agents, tasks=self.tasks, process=Process.sequential, verbose=True )main.py
crew = ContentCrew() result = crew.crew().kickoff(inputs={"topic": "AI Agents in 2025"})
-
name: Hierarchical Process description: Manager agent delegates to workers when_to_use: Complex tasks needing coordination implementation: | from crewai import Crew, Process
Define specialized agents
researcher = Agent( role="Research Specialist", goal="Find accurate information", backstory="Expert researcher..." )
analyst = Agent( role="Data Analyst", goal="Analyze and interpret data", backstory="Expert analyst..." )
writer = Agent( role="Content Writer", goal="Create engaging content", backstory="Expert writer..." )
Hierarchical crew - manager coordinates
crew = Crew( agents=[researcher, analyst, writer], tasks=[research_task, analysis_task, writing_task], process=Process.hierarchical, manager_llm=ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-4o"), # Manager model verbose=True )
Manager decides:
- Which agent handles which task
- When to delegate
- How to combine results
result = crew.kickoff()
-
name: Planning Feature description: Generate execution plan before running when_to_use: Complex workflows needing structure implementation: | from crewai import Crew, Process
Enable planning
crew = Crew( agents=[researcher, writer, reviewer], tasks=[research, write, review], process=Process.sequential, planning=True, # Enable planning planning_llm=ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-4o") # Planner model )
With planning enabled:
1. CrewAI generates step-by-step plan
2. Plan is injected into each task
3. Agents see overall structure
4. More consistent results
result = crew.kickoff()
Access the plan
print(crew.plan)
-
name: Memory Configuration description: Enable agent memory for context when_to_use: Multi-turn or complex workflows implementation: | from crewai import Crew
Memory types:
- Short-term: Within task execution
- Long-term: Across executions
- Entity: About specific entities
crew = Crew( agents=[...], tasks=[...], memory=True, # Enable all memory types verbose=True )
Custom memory config
from crewai.memory import LongTermMemory, ShortTermMemory
crew = Crew( agents=[...], tasks=[...], memory=True, long_term_memory=LongTermMemory( storage=CustomStorage() # Custom backend ), short_term_memory=ShortTermMemory( storage=CustomStorage() ), embedder={ "provider": "openai", "config": {"model": "text-embedding-3-small"} } )
Memory helps agents:
- Remember previous interactions
- Build on past work
- Maintain consistency
-
name: Flows for Complex Workflows description: Event-driven orchestration with state when_to_use: Complex, multi-stage workflows implementation: | from crewai.flow.flow import Flow, listen, start, and_, or_, router
class ContentFlow(Flow): # State persists across steps model_config = {"extra": "allow"}
@start() def gather_requirements(self): """First step - gather inputs.""" self.topic = self.inputs.get("topic", "AI") self.style = self.inputs.get("style", "professional") return {"topic": self.topic} @listen(gather_requirements) def research(self, requirements): """Research after requirements gathered.""" research_crew = ResearchCrew() result = research_crew.crew().kickoff( inputs={"topic": requirements["topic"]} ) self.research = result.raw return result @listen(research) def write_content(self, research_result): """Write after research complete.""" writing_crew = WritingCrew() result = writing_crew.crew().kickoff( inputs={ "research": self.research, "style": self.style } ) return result @router(write_content) def quality_check(self, content): """Route based on quality.""" if self.needs_revision(content): return "revise" return "publish" @listen("revise") def revise_content(self): """Revision flow.""" # Re-run writing with feedback pass @listen("publish") def publish_content(self): """Final publishing.""" return {"status": "published", "content": self.content}Run flow
flow = ContentFlow() result = flow.kickoff(inputs={"topic": "AI Agents"})
-
name: Custom Tools description: Create tools for agents when_to_use: Agents need external capabilities implementation: | from crewai.tools import BaseTool from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
Method 1: Class-based tool
class SearchInput(BaseModel): query: str = Field(..., description="Search query")
class WebSearchTool(BaseTool): name: str = "web_search" description: str = "Search the web for information" args_schema: type[BaseModel] = SearchInput
def _run(self, query: str) -> str: # Implementation results = search_api.search(query) return format_results(results)Method 2: Function decorator
from crewai import tool
@tool("Database Query") def query_database(sql: str) -> str: """Execute SQL query and return results.""" return db.execute(sql)
Assign tools to agents
researcher = Agent( role="Researcher", goal="Find information", backstory="...", tools=[WebSearchTool(), query_database] )
anti_patterns:
-
name: Vague Agent Roles description: Generic roles without clear expertise why_bad: | Agent doesn't know its specialty. Overlapping responsibilities. Poor task delegation. what_to_do_instead: | Be specific:
- "Senior React Developer" not "Developer"
- "Financial Analyst specializing in crypto" not "Analyst" Include specific skills in backstory.
-
name: Missing Expected Outputs description: Tasks without clear expected_output why_bad: | Agent doesn't know done criteria. Inconsistent outputs. Hard to chain tasks. what_to_do_instead: | Always specify expected_output: expected_output: | A JSON object with: - summary: string (100 words max) - key_points: list of strings - confidence: float 0-1
-
name: Too Many Agents description: Creating agent for every small task why_bad: | Coordination overhead. Inconsistent communication. Slower execution. what_to_do_instead: | 3-5 agents with clear roles. One agent can handle multiple related tasks. Use tools instead of agents for simple actions.
-
name: No Task Context description: Tasks don't reference previous outputs why_bad: | Agents work in isolation. Lost information between tasks. Redundant work. what_to_do_instead: | Use context in task config: writing_task: context: - research_task - analysis_task
handoffs:
-
trigger: "langgraph|state machine|graph" to: langgraph context: "Need graph-based agent with explicit state"
-
trigger: "observability|tracing" to: langfuse context: "Need LLM observability"
-
trigger: "structured output|json" to: structured-output context: "Need structured responses"