Agents team-composition-patterns
Design optimal agent team compositions with sizing heuristics, preset configurations, and agent type selection. Use this skill when deciding how many agents to spawn for a task, when choosing between a review team versus a feature team versus a debug team, when selecting the correct subagent_type for each role to ensure agents have the tools they need, when configuring display modes (tmux, iTerm2, in-process) for a CI or local environment, or when building a custom team composition for a non-standard workflow such as a migration or security audit.
git clone https://github.com/wshobson/agents
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/wshobson/agents "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/plugins/agent-teams/skills/team-composition-patterns" ~/.claude/skills/wshobson-agents-team-composition-patterns && rm -rf "$T"
plugins/agent-teams/skills/team-composition-patterns/SKILL.mdTeam Composition Patterns
Best practices for composing multi-agent teams, selecting team sizes, choosing agent types, and configuring display modes for Claude Code's Agent Teams feature.
When to Use This Skill
- Deciding how many teammates to spawn for a task
- Choosing between preset team configurations
- Selecting the right agent type (subagent_type) for each role
- Configuring teammate display modes (tmux, iTerm2, in-process)
- Building custom team compositions for non-standard workflows
Team Sizing Heuristics
| Complexity | Team Size | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Simple | 1-2 | Single-dimension review, isolated bug, small feature |
| Moderate | 2-3 | Multi-file changes, 2-3 concerns, medium features |
| Complex | 3-4 | Cross-cutting concerns, large features, deep debugging |
| Very Complex | 4-5 | Full-stack features, comprehensive reviews, systemic issues |
Rule of thumb: Start with the smallest team that covers all required dimensions. Adding teammates increases coordination overhead.
Preset Team Compositions
Review Team
- Size: 3 reviewers
- Agents: 3x
team-reviewer - Default dimensions: security, performance, architecture
- Use when: Code changes need multi-dimensional quality assessment
Debug Team
- Size: 3 investigators
- Agents: 3x
team-debugger - Default hypotheses: 3 competing hypotheses
- Use when: Bug has multiple plausible root causes
Feature Team
- Size: 3 (1 lead + 2 implementers)
- Agents: 1x
+ 2xteam-leadteam-implementer - Use when: Feature can be decomposed into parallel work streams
Fullstack Team
- Size: 4 (1 lead + 3 implementers)
- Agents: 1x
+ 1x frontendteam-lead
+ 1x backendteam-implementer
+ 1x testteam-implementerteam-implementer - Use when: Feature spans frontend, backend, and test layers
Research Team
- Size: 3 researchers
- Agents: 3x
general-purpose - Default areas: Each assigned a different research question, module, or topic
- Capabilities: Codebase search (Grep, Glob, Read), web search (WebSearch, WebFetch)
- Use when: Need to understand a codebase, research libraries, compare approaches, or gather information from code and web sources in parallel
Security Team
- Size: 4 reviewers
- Agents: 4x
team-reviewer - Default dimensions: OWASP/vulnerabilities, auth/access control, dependencies/supply chain, secrets/configuration
- Use when: Comprehensive security audit covering multiple attack surfaces
Migration Team
- Size: 4 (1 lead + 2 implementers + 1 reviewer)
- Agents: 1x
+ 2xteam-lead
+ 1xteam-implementerteam-reviewer - Use when: Large codebase migration (framework upgrade, language port, API version bump) requiring parallel work with correctness verification
Agent Type Selection
When spawning teammates with the
Agent tool, choose subagent_type based on what tools the teammate needs:
| Agent Type | Tools Available | Use For |
|---|---|---|
| All tools (Read, Write, Edit, Bash, etc.) | Implementation, debugging, any task requiring file changes |
| Read-only tools (Read, Grep, Glob) | Research, code exploration, analysis |
| Read-only tools | Architecture planning, task decomposition |
| All tools | Code review with structured findings |
| All tools | Hypothesis-driven investigation |
| All tools | Building features within file ownership boundaries |
| All tools | Team orchestration and coordination |
Key distinction: Read-only agents (Explore, Plan) cannot modify files. Never assign implementation tasks to read-only agents.
Display Mode Configuration
Configure in
~/.claude/settings.json:
{ "teammateMode": "tmux" }
| Mode | Behavior | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Each teammate in a tmux pane | Development workflows, monitoring multiple agents |
| Each teammate in an iTerm2 tab | macOS users who prefer iTerm2 |
| All teammates in same process | Simple tasks, CI/CD environments |
Custom Team Guidelines
When building custom teams:
- Every team needs a coordinator — Either designate a
or have the user coordinate directlyteam-lead - Match roles to agent types — Use specialized agents (reviewer, debugger, implementer) when available
- Avoid duplicate roles — Two agents doing the same thing wastes resources
- Define boundaries upfront — Each teammate needs clear ownership of files or responsibilities
- Keep it small — 2-4 teammates is the sweet spot; 5+ requires significant coordination overhead
Troubleshooting
A teammate was spawned as
but needs to write files.
Explore
Explore and Plan are read-only agents. Change the subagent_type to general-purpose or an appropriate specialized agent type. Never assign implementation tasks to read-only agents.
The team is growing too large and coordination is slowing everything down. Each additional teammate adds communication overhead. Consolidate roles: can one agent cover two dimensions? A 4-person team doing 6 independent tasks is usually better served by 3 agents covering 2 tasks each.
tmux mode is not showing panes. Ensure tmux is installed and a session is already running before spawning teammates. The
in-process mode works without tmux and is suitable for CI or scripted environments.
Two reviewers are flagging the same issues. The review dimensions overlap. Redefine each reviewer's focus area: one on correctness/logic, one on security, one on performance/scalability. Overlapping coverage wastes tokens and produces duplicate findings.
A
is spawning teammates but they are not receiving tasks.
Verify that the lead is using the team-lead
Agent tool to spawn teammates and passing complete context in the prompt. Teammates start fresh with no prior conversation history — they need all relevant information in their initial prompt.
Related Skills
- parallel-feature-development — Decompose work streams and assign file ownership once the team is composed
- team-communication-protocols — Establish messaging norms and shutdown procedures for the assembled team