Product-org-os product-teardown
'Reverse-engineer an existing product to understand its strategy, business model, UX decisions, and growth mechanics. A learning exercise that builds PM judgment. Activate when: "teardown",
git clone https://github.com/yohayetsion/product-org-os
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/yohayetsion/product-org-os "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/product-teardown" ~/.claude/skills/yohayetsion-product-org-os-product-teardown && rm -rf "$T"
skills/product-teardown/SKILL.mdDocument Intelligence
This skill supports three modes: Create, Update, and Find.
Mode Detection
| Signal | Mode | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| "update", "add to", "refresh" in input | UPDATE | 100% |
| File path provided | UPDATE | 100% |
| "create", "new", "teardown" in input | CREATE | 100% |
| "find", "search", "list teardowns" | FIND | 100% |
| "the teardown", "last teardown" | UPDATE | 85% |
| Just a product name | CREATE | 80% |
Threshold: >=85% auto-proceed | 70-84% state assumption | <70% ask user
Mode Behaviors
CREATE: Generate complete new teardown using template below.
UPDATE:
- Check document registry first, then search user's structure
- Preserve existing analysis sections
- Add new observations, update competitive context
- Show diff summary of what changed
FIND: Check registry, then search user's folders for teardown documents.
Search Locations
{Product}/Product/teardowns/context/documents/index.mdcontext/learnings/
Vision to Value Phase
Phase 6: Learning & Adaptation -- Judgment building through reverse engineering. Teardowns are a learning exercise, not a strategic deliverable.
<!-- Source: Product teardowns as a PM learning tool. Inspired by compound-pm-marketplace `/pm:teardown` (Abhitsian). Also draws from First Round Review's "Product Teardown" series and Lenny Rachitsky's product deep-dives (Lenny's Newsletter). The core insight: reverse-engineering successful products builds product intuition faster than reading frameworks. -->Methodology
The Teardown Framework
<!-- Source: Adapted from compound-pm-marketplace teardown structure (Abhitsian, 2024). The framework combines strategic analysis (business model, positioning) with product craft analysis (UX, growth loops). Key influence: Ben Thompson's Stratechery analysis style — understand the strategy through the product, not just the product through features. -->Analyze the product through 8 lenses:
Lens 1: Target User
- Who is the primary user? Secondary?
- What job are they hiring this product to do?
- What was the user doing before this product existed?
Lens 2: Problem Solved
- What pain point does this address?
- How acute is the pain? (Vitamin vs painkiller vs life-saving)
- How is the problem currently solved (alternatives)?
Lens 3: Business Model
- How does this product make money?
- What's the pricing structure? (Freemium, subscription, usage, marketplace take rate)
- Who is the economic buyer vs the user?
- What are the unit economics likely to look like?
Lens 4: Key Features (Why They Exist)
- List 5-8 core features
- For each: WHY does this feature exist? What behavior does it drive?
- What's notably ABSENT? What did they choose NOT to build?
- What's the feature that makes you go "that's clever"?
Lens 5: Growth Mechanics
- What is the primary growth loop? (Viral, content, paid, sales-led)
- Is there a network effect? What kind? (Direct, cross-side, data)
- What's the activation moment? How quickly do new users reach it?
- What's the retention hook?
Lens 6: Monetization Strategy
- When in the user journey does monetization kick in?
- What triggers the upgrade/purchase decision?
- Is pricing aligned with value delivered?
- What's the expansion revenue mechanism?
Lens 7: Competitive Positioning
- Where does this sit in the market?
- What's the core differentiator? (Cost, feature, experience, brand, network)
- Who are they NOT competing with (and why)?
- What would make a user switch away?
Lens 8: What to Steal / What to Avoid
- 2-3 things this product does brilliantly that you'd want to emulate
- 1-2 things that are weak or risky that you'd avoid
- 1 non-obvious insight from studying this product
Quality Gate
A good teardown should make you say "I now understand WHY they built it this way" -- not just WHAT they built.
Output Structure
# Product Teardown: [Product Name] **Date**: [YYYY-MM-DD] **Analyst**: [Name/Role] **Product URL**: [URL] **Category**: [SaaS / Marketplace / Consumer / Developer Tool / etc.] ## Executive Summary [2-3 sentences: What this product is, who it serves, and the one insight that stood out most from this teardown.] ## 1. Target User **Primary user**: [Who] **Job-to-be-done**: [What they hire this product to do] **Previous solution**: [What they did before] **User sophistication**: [Technical / Non-technical / Mixed] ## 2. Problem Solved **Core pain**: [The problem in one sentence] **Pain intensity**: [Vitamin / Painkiller / Life-saving] **Current alternatives**: [How people solve this without the product] **Why alternatives fail**: [Gap that this product fills] ## 3. Business Model **Revenue model**: [How it makes money] **Pricing structure**: [Tiers, pricing philosophy] **Economic buyer vs user**: [Same / Different — who pays, who uses] **Monetization timing**: [When in the journey does payment happen] ## 4. Key Features Analysis | Feature | Why It Exists | Behavior It Drives | Clever Because | |---------|--------------|-------------------|----------------| | [Feature 1] | [Strategic reason] | [User behavior] | [Insight] | | [Feature 2] | [Strategic reason] | [User behavior] | [Insight] | | [Feature 3] | [Strategic reason] | [User behavior] | [Insight] | **Notable absences**: [What they chose NOT to build and why] ## 5. Growth Mechanics **Primary growth loop**: [Viral / Content / Paid / Sales-led / Product-led] **Network effects**: [Type or None] **Activation moment**: [What aha moment drives retention] **Retention hook**: [What keeps users coming back] **Expansion mechanism**: [How usage/revenue grows within accounts] ## 6. Monetization Strategy **Free-to-paid trigger**: [What drives conversion] **Value alignment**: [Is pricing tied to value delivered? How?] **Expansion revenue**: [How do accounts grow in spend over time] **Pricing psychology**: [Any clever pricing tactics observed] ## 7. Competitive Positioning **Market position**: [Leader / Challenger / Niche / Disruptor] **Core differentiator**: [What makes them defensible] **NOT competing with**: [Adjacent products they deliberately avoid] **Switch triggers**: [What would make users leave] ## 8. Steal / Avoid ### What to Steal 1. [Brilliant thing #1 — and why it works] 2. [Brilliant thing #2 — and why it works] 3. [Brilliant thing #3 — and why it works] ### What to Avoid 1. [Weakness #1 — and the risk it creates] 2. [Weakness #2 — and the risk it creates] ### Non-Obvious Insight [The one thing you didn't expect to learn from this teardown] ## Judgment Notes [What did this teardown teach you about product strategy? How does it change how you think about your own product decisions?]
Instructions
- This is a learning skill, not a deliverable skill. The output builds PM judgment through reverse engineering. It does not produce strategic documents for the organization.
- Research the product thoroughly before writing. Use the product if possible. Read their pricing page, changelog, blog, and job postings for clues.
- Focus on the WHY behind decisions, not just the WHAT.
- Be opinionated in the "Steal / Avoid" section. Weak teardowns hedge everything.
- The "Non-Obvious Insight" should genuinely surprise. If it doesn't, dig deeper.
- Save teardowns to
or a personal learning folder.{Product}/Product/teardowns/ - After completing, offer to extract learnings via
for organizational memory./compound - Consider connecting insights to active products via
./context-save
Integration
- Feeds into:
(learning extraction),/compound
(organizational memory)/context-save - Related to but distinct from:
(strategic),/competitive-analysis
(market mapping)/competitive-landscape - Can inform:
(insights from studying others),/strategic-bet
(differentiation ideas)/positioning-statement
Vision to Value Operating Principle
"The best product leaders are students of other products. Teardowns build the pattern recognition that separates good decisions from great ones."