install
source · Clone the upstream repo
git clone https://github.com/zubair-trabzada/ai-legal-claude
Claude Code · Install into ~/.claude/skills/
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/zubair-trabzada/ai-legal-claude "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/legal-review" ~/.claude/skills/zubair-trabzada-ai-legal-claude-legal-review && rm -rf "$T"
manifest:
skills/legal-review/SKILL.mdsource content
Full Contract Review — Flagship Orchestrator
You are the full contract review engine for
/legal review <file>. You launch 5 parallel subagents, aggregate their results, and produce a unified CONTRACT-REVIEW.md report with a Contract Safety Score, clause-by-clause analysis, and prioritized action items.
When This Skill Is Invoked
The user runs
/legal review <file>. This is the flagship command. It produces the most comprehensive deliverable: a scored, prioritized, actionable contract analysis with specific recommendations for every risky clause.
Phase 1: Contract Ingestion (Sequential — Pre-Analysis)
Before launching subagents, perform these steps sequentially.
1.1 Read the Contract
Accept the contract from one of these sources:
- File path — Use the Read tool to read the file
- Pasted text — Accept text pasted directly into the chat
- URL — Use WebFetch to retrieve the document
Store the full contract text for subagent consumption.
If the contract is unreadable:
- Report the error to the user
- Ask for an alternative format
- Do NOT proceed to Phase 2 without contract text
1.2 Classify the Contract Type
Identify the contract type to calibrate analysis:
| Contract Type | Detection Signals | Key Risk Areas |
|---|---|---|
| Service Agreement | "services," "deliverables," "scope of work," "retainer" | Scope creep, payment terms, termination, IP ownership |
| Employment Contract | "employee," "salary," "benefits," "at-will" | Non-compete, IP assignment, severance, termination |
| NDA / Confidentiality | "confidential information," "non-disclosure," "receiving party" | Definition breadth, duration, exclusions, remedies |
| SaaS / Software License | "subscription," "SLA," "uptime," "license grant" | Auto-renewal, data ownership, liability caps, SLA penalties |
| Freelancer / Contractor | "independent contractor," "1099," "work product" | Misclassification risk, IP ownership, payment terms, kill fees |
| Partnership Agreement | "partner," "profit sharing," "capital contribution" | Dissolution terms, decision authority, liability allocation |
| Lease / Rental | "landlord," "tenant," "premises," "rent" | Termination penalties, maintenance liability, renewal terms |
| Sales / Purchase | "buyer," "seller," "purchase price," "warranty" | Warranty limitations, return policies, indemnification |
| Investment / SAFE | "investor," "valuation cap," "equity," "convertible" | Dilution, liquidation preferences, board rights, pro-rata |
1.3 Extract Contract Metadata
Extract and store:
- Parties involved — Names and roles of all parties
- Effective date — When the contract starts
- Term / Duration — How long it lasts
- Governing law — Which jurisdiction
- Total value — Payment amounts if specified
- Contract length — Number of pages/sections/clauses
Phase 2: Launch 5 Parallel Subagents
Launch ALL 5 subagents simultaneously using the Agent tool. Each agent receives:
- The full contract text
- The contract type classification
- The contract metadata
Subagent Assignments
| Agent File | Role | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Clause Analysis — Identifies and categorizes every clause | 20% |
| Risk Assessment — Scores each clause for risk level | 25% |
| Compliance Check — Flags regulatory and legal issues | 20% |
| Terms & Obligations — Maps duties, deadlines, and triggers | 15% |
| Recommendations — Generates specific fixes for every issue | 20% |
Agent launch instructions:
Launch each agent with this prompt structure: "You are the [Agent Role] subagent for the AI Legal Assistant. Analyze the following contract and return your findings in the specified format. CONTRACT TYPE: [detected type] CONTRACT METADATA: [extracted metadata] FULL CONTRACT TEXT: [paste full contract text] Return your analysis in the exact output format specified in your agent instructions."
Phase 3: Aggregate Results
Once all 5 agents return, compile the unified report.
3.1 Calculate Contract Safety Score
Use weighted scoring from all agents:
| Score Range | Grade | Label | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | A+ | Safe | Low risk, standard favorable terms |
| 80-89 | A | Good | Minor issues, generally favorable |
| 70-79 | B | Fair | Some concerning clauses need attention |
| 60-69 | C | Caution | Multiple risky clauses, negotiate before signing |
| 40-59 | D | Risky | Significant risks, strong negotiation needed |
| 0-39 | F | Dangerous | Do not sign without major revisions |
3.2 Build the Report
Generate
CONTRACT-REVIEW-[name]-[date].md with this structure:
# Contract Review Report ⚠️ LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This analysis is AI-generated and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult a licensed attorney before signing. ## Contract Safety Score: [SCORE]/100 — Grade: [LETTER] ([LABEL]) ## Executive Summary [3-4 sentence overview of the contract, key findings, and recommendation] ## Contract Details | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Contract Type | [type] | | Parties | [party 1] ↔ [party 2] | | Effective Date | [date] | | Term | [duration] | | Total Value | [amount or N/A] | | Governing Law | [jurisdiction] | ## Risk Dashboard | Risk Level | Count | Clauses | |------------|-------|---------| | 🔴 High Risk | [n] | [clause names] | | 🟡 Medium Risk | [n] | [clause names] | | 🟢 Low Risk | [n] | [clause names] | ## Clause-by-Clause Analysis ### 🔴 HIGH RISK CLAUSES #### [Clause Name] — Section [X.X] - **What it says:** [plain English summary] - **Why it's risky:** [specific explanation] - **What you could lose:** [quantified impact if possible] - **Recommended change:** [specific alternative language] [Repeat for each high-risk clause] ### 🟡 MEDIUM RISK CLAUSES [Same format as above] ### 🟢 LOW RISK / STANDARD CLAUSES [Brief summary of standard clauses that are acceptable] ## Missing Protections [List of clauses that SHOULD be in this contract but are NOT] ## Obligations & Deadlines | Obligation | Party | Deadline | Consequence of Missing | |------------|-------|----------|----------------------| | [obligation] | [who] | [when] | [what happens] | ## Compliance Flags [Any regulatory, legal, or jurisdictional concerns] ## Negotiation Priorities 1. [Most important change — with specific language to propose] 2. [Second most important] 3. [Third most important] [Ranked list of what to negotiate first] ## Recommended Next Steps 1. [ ] [First action to take] 2. [ ] [Second action] 3. [ ] [Third action] 4. [ ] Consult a licensed attorney before signing
Phase 4: Present to User
After generating the report:
- Display the Contract Safety Score prominently
- Summarize the top 3 risks in plain English
- Show the full report
- Ask: "Would you like me to generate counter-proposals for the risky clauses? Run
to get specific language to send back."/legal negotiate - Mention: "Run
to generate a professional PDF version of this analysis."/legal report-pdf