git clone https://github.com/zubair-trabzada/ai-marketing-claude
T=$(mktemp -d) && git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/zubair-trabzada/ai-marketing-claude "$T" && mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cp -r "$T/skills/market-report-pdf" ~/.claude/skills/zubair-trabzada-ai-marketing-claude-market-report-pdf && rm -rf "$T"
skills/market-report-pdf/SKILL.mdPDF Marketing Report Generator
Skill Purpose
Generate a professional, visually polished PDF marketing report using the Python script
scripts/generate_pdf_report.py. This skill collects all available audit and analysis data, structures it into the expected JSON format, invokes the script, and produces a branded PDF with score gauges, bar charts, comparison tables, findings, and a prioritized action plan.
When to Use
- User wants a PDF version of the marketing report (not just Markdown)
- User is preparing a deliverable for a client presentation
- User asks for a "polished report", "client-ready report", or "PDF report"
- User wants a visual report with charts and scores
- Triggered by
or/market report-pdf/market report-pdf <domain>
When to Use PDF vs Markdown
| Format | Best For | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Client presentations, email attachments, sales collateral | Professional appearance, consistent formatting, visual charts, printable | Harder to edit, requires Python script | |
| Markdown | Internal use, quick reference, iterative editing, version control | Easy to edit, readable in any editor, git-friendly | Less visually polished, no charts |
Rule of thumb: If the report is going to a client or prospect, use PDF. If it is for internal use or further editing, use Markdown.
How to Execute
Step 1: Collect All Available Data
Gather data from all previous skill runs. Check for these files in the project directory:
Primary data sources:
-- Overall audit resultsMARKETING-AUDIT.md
-- Landing page conversion analysisLANDING-CRO.md
-- SEO findingsSEO-AUDIT.md
-- Brand voice analysisBRAND-VOICE.md
-- Competitor comparison dataCOMPETITOR-ANALYSIS.md
-- Funnel analysisFUNNEL-ANALYSIS.md
-- Social media auditSOCIAL-AUDIT.md
-- Email marketing auditEMAIL-AUDIT.md
-- Advertising auditAD-AUDIT.md
If no previous data exists:
- Recommend the user run
first for the best results/market audit <url> - If the user insists on generating a report without prior audits, analyze the provided URL directly and build the data structure from scratch
- Use the analyze_page.py script to gather automated data:
python scripts/analyze_page.py <url>
Step 2: Build the JSON Data Structure
The
scripts/generate_pdf_report.py script expects a JSON file as input with this exact structure:
{ "url": "https://example.com", "date": "March 1, 2026", "brand_name": "Example Co", "overall_score": 62, "executive_summary": "A 2-4 sentence summary of the overall marketing health, key opportunities, and estimated revenue impact of implementing recommendations.", "categories": { "Content & Messaging": { "score": 68, "weight": "25%" }, "Conversion Optimization": { "score": 52, "weight": "20%" }, "SEO & Discoverability": { "score": 74, "weight": "20%" }, "Competitive Positioning": { "score": 48, "weight": "15%" }, "Brand & Trust": { "score": 70, "weight": "10%" }, "Growth & Strategy": { "score": 55, "weight": "10%" } }, "findings": [ { "severity": "Critical", "finding": "Description of the most important finding" }, { "severity": "High", "finding": "Description of a high-priority finding" }, { "severity": "Medium", "finding": "Description of a medium-priority finding" }, { "severity": "Low", "finding": "Description of a lower-priority finding" } ], "quick_wins": [ "First quick win action item", "Second quick win action item", "Third quick win action item" ], "medium_term": [ "First medium-term action item", "Second medium-term action item", "Third medium-term action item" ], "strategic": [ "First strategic action item", "Second strategic action item", "Third strategic action item" ], "competitors": [ { "name": "Competitor A", "positioning": "Their market position", "pricing": "Their pricing model", "social_proof": "Their trust signals", "content": "Their content approach" }, { "name": "Competitor B", "positioning": "Their market position", "pricing": "Their pricing model", "social_proof": "Their trust signals", "content": "Their content approach" } ] }
Step 3: Field-by-Field Data Assembly Guide
url
(string, required)
urlThe target website URL. Use the full URL including protocol.
date
(string, required)
dateThe report generation date. Format: "Month DD, YYYY" (e.g., "March 1, 2026").
brand_name
(string, required)
brand_nameThe company or brand name. Used in competitor comparison table headers.
overall_score
(integer, 0-100, required)
overall_scoreThe weighted average of all category scores. Calculate as:
overall_score = (content * 0.25) + (conversion * 0.20) + (seo * 0.20) + (competitive * 0.15) + (brand * 0.10) + (growth * 0.10)
executive_summary
(string, required)
executive_summaryA 2-4 sentence summary covering:
- Current marketing health assessment
- Top 1-2 most impactful findings
- Estimated revenue impact of implementing recommendations
- Recommended first step
Keep it concise and impactful. This appears on the cover page right below the score gauge.
categories
(object, required)
categoriesExactly 6 categories with their scores. The categories map to these evaluation areas:
| Category | What It Measures | Scoring Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Content & Messaging | Copy quality, value proposition, headline clarity, CTA text, brand voice consistency | 80+: Clear, benefit-driven, specific. 60-79: Adequate but generic. <60: Vague, feature-focused, unclear |
| Conversion Optimization | Social proof, form design, CTA placement, objection handling, urgency | 80+: Multiple proof types, optimized forms, clear CTAs. 60-79: Some elements present. <60: Missing critical elements |
| SEO & Discoverability | Title tags, meta descriptions, headers, schema, internal linking, page speed | 80+: Fully optimized. 60-79: Mostly present with gaps. <60: Major issues or missing elements |
| Competitive Positioning | Differentiation, pricing clarity, comparison content, market awareness | 80+: Clear positioning, comparison pages exist. 60-79: Some differentiation. <60: No clear positioning |
| Brand & Trust | Design quality, trust badges, security indicators, professional appearance | 80+: Modern design, trust signals throughout. 60-79: Adequate design. <60: Outdated or unprofessional |
| Growth & Strategy | Lead capture, email marketing, content strategy, acquisition channels | 80+: Multi-channel strategy in place. 60-79: Some channels active. <60: No clear growth strategy |
findings
(array, required)
findingsAn array of finding objects, each with
severity and finding fields.
Severity levels:
-- Directly losing revenue or customers. Fix immediately.Critical
-- Significant impact on growth. Fix within 1-2 weeks.High
-- Meaningful improvement opportunity. Fix within 1 month.Medium
-- Nice-to-have improvement. Fix when time allows.Low
Writing effective findings:
- Be specific: "Homepage headline says 'Welcome to Our Platform'" not "Headline needs improvement"
- Quantify impact: "Missing meta descriptions on 8 of 12 landing pages"
- Reference benchmarks: "Page load time is 4.2s (benchmark: under 2s)"
- Include evidence: "No testimonials found on homepage, pricing page, or signup page"
Aim for 5-10 findings. Order from most to least severe.
quick_wins
(array, required)
quick_wins3-5 action items that can be implemented within one week with minimal effort. Each should be a specific, actionable instruction.
Good quick win: "Rewrite the homepage headline from 'Welcome to Our Platform' to 'Cut Your Reporting Time by 75% -- Automated Analytics for Growth Teams'"
Bad quick win: "Improve the headline" (too vague)
medium_term
(array, required)
medium_term3-5 action items requiring 1-3 months to implement. These are more involved but have high impact.
strategic
(array, required)
strategic3-5 action items requiring 3-6 months. These are foundational changes that require planning and sustained effort.
competitors
(array, optional)
competitorsUp to 3 competitor objects for the comparison table. If no competitor data is available, omit this field -- the script will skip the competitor section.
Step 4: Write the JSON File
Save the assembled data as a temporary JSON file:
# Write the JSON data to a temporary file cat > /tmp/report_data.json << 'JSONEOF' { ... assembled JSON data ... } JSONEOF
Step 5: Invoke the PDF Generator Script
Prerequisites check: First, verify that
reportlab is installed:
python3 -c "import reportlab" 2>/dev/null || pip3 install reportlab
Generate the report:
python3 scripts/generate_pdf_report.py /tmp/report_data.json "MARKETING-REPORT-<domain>.pdf"
Replace
<domain> with the target website's domain name (without protocol or www), using hyphens instead of dots. For example:
becomesexample.comMARKETING-REPORT-example-com.pdf
becomesmyapp.ioMARKETING-REPORT-myapp-io.pdf
Demo mode (no arguments): Running the script without arguments generates a sample report with placeholder data:
python3 scripts/generate_pdf_report.py # Creates: MARKETING-REPORT-sample.pdf
Step 6: Verify the Output
After generation, verify the PDF was created:
ls -la "MARKETING-REPORT-<domain>.pdf"
Report the file path and size to the user.
Step 7: Clean Up
Remove the temporary JSON file:
rm /tmp/report_data.json
PDF Report Contents
The generated PDF includes the following pages:
Page 1: Cover Page
- Report title: "Marketing Audit Report"
- Target URL
- Generation date
- Overall score gauge (circular visualization with color coding)
- Grade letter (A+ through F)
- Executive summary paragraph
Page 2: Score Breakdown
- Horizontal bar chart showing all 6 category scores with color coding
- Score table with category names, scores, weights, and status labels
- Color coding: Green (80+), Blue (60-79), Yellow (40-59), Red (<40)
Page 3: Key Findings
- Findings table with severity labels and descriptions
- Color-coded severity indicators (Critical = red, High = orange, Medium = yellow, Low = blue)
- Findings ordered from most to least severe
Page 4: Prioritized Action Plan
- Quick Wins section (This Week)
- Medium-Term section (1-3 Months)
- Strategic section (3-6 Months)
- Numbered action items in each tier
Page 5: Competitive Landscape (if competitor data provided)
- Comparison table with client vs up to 3 competitors
- Rows: Positioning, Pricing, Social Proof, Content
Final Page: Methodology
- Scoring methodology explanation
- Category weights and measurement criteria
- Footer: "Generated by AI Marketing Suite for Claude Code"
Color Scheme
The PDF uses a professional color palette:
| Element | Color | Hex Code |
|---|---|---|
| Primary (headers, titles) | Dark Navy | #1B2A4A |
| Accent (links, highlights) | Blue | #2D5BFF |
| Highlight (attention) | Orange | #FF6B35 |
| Success (high scores) | Green | #00C853 |
| Warning (medium scores) | Amber | #FFB300 |
| Danger (low scores, critical) | Red | #FF1744 |
| Light background | Light Gray | #F5F7FA |
| Body text | Dark Gray | #2C3E50 |
| Secondary text | Medium Gray | #7F8C9B |
| Borders | Light Border | #E0E6ED |
Score-to-Color Mapping
- 80-100: Green (#00C853) -- Strong performance
- 60-79: Blue (#2D5BFF) -- Solid with room to improve
- 40-59: Amber (#FFB300) -- Needs attention
- 0-39: Red (#FF1744) -- Critical issues
Troubleshooting
| Issue | Solution |
|---|---|
| Run |
| Script produces empty PDF | Check that JSON data has all required fields |
| Score gauge not rendering | Ensure is a number 0-100 |
| Competitor table missing | Ensure array has objects with , , , , fields |
| PDF is only 1 page | Check for JSON parsing errors -- run |
| Fonts look wrong | The script uses Helvetica (built into reportlab). No custom fonts needed. |
Integration with Other Skills
This skill works best when combined with other audit skills. The recommended workflow:
- Run
-- Generates comprehensive audit data/market audit <url> - Run
-- Adds competitor comparison data/market competitors <url> - Run
-- Adds detailed SEO findings/market seo <url> - Run
-- Adds CRO analysis/market landing <url> - Run
-- Compiles everything into a PDF/market report-pdf <url>
The PDF report skill will automatically look for output files from these skills and incorporate their data into the report JSON.
Output
- File:
MARKETING-REPORT-<domain>.pdf - Location: Project root directory
- Size: Typically 200KB-500KB depending on content volume
- Pages: 5-7 pages depending on whether competitor data and additional sections are included
Key Principles
- The PDF report is the most client-facing deliverable in the toolkit. Quality matters.
- Always verify the JSON data is complete and accurate before generating. Garbage in, garbage out.
- Use the PDF for initial client impressions and sales conversations. Follow up with the more detailed Markdown report if the client engages.
- Every score should be justifiable. If a client asks "why did I get a 52 in Conversion Optimization?", the findings should provide clear evidence.
- Round scores to whole numbers. Decimals imply false precision.
- Keep the executive summary tight -- 2-4 sentences maximum. Clients skim cover pages.
- If generating for a prospect (not yet a client), the report serves as a sales tool. Make the opportunities compelling and the action plan achievable.